Re: A message for Peter Moran, et al

Peter Moran wrote:
<awthrawthr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143605258.797253.148730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Although some might think so, I don't believe your ignorance regarding
natural cures is due to monetary greed...although certainly the drug
industry and the radiation manufacturers are interested in maximizing
their profits with the fallout that patients are being unmercifully and
ignorantly killed by the minute.

Likewise, surgeons do make most of their money by performing surgery.
But that is not to imply that you're evilly sitting around plotting how
to maim patients for their money.

At the same time, I have interviewed people who were going to die from
the cancers in weeks or months (one was in a coma before she recovered
due to natural medicine.) One patient was a Harvard grad who also
graduated from Yale Medical School. At the age of 29 he came down with
a biopsy result of an undifferentiated brain tumor. He was told he had
two to four months to live. He wrote every medical expert he knew...and
he knew quite a few. They had no solution for him. So he went to see
Dr. Emanuel Revici, someone that Stephen Barrett considers to be a
quack (based on a false report published in JAMA.)

Dr. Fishbein, the brain tumor victim, has survived cancer-free for more
than forty years! There are many more true stories like this
one...patients who were given no chance, but who have been cancer free
for a long time. Every cancer doctor hopefully has one patient he can
point to that defied the odds (usually that one patient was using
natural cures alongside whatever the doctor had prescribed.)

But when a doctor has scores of incredible cures of patients who were
supposedly incurable...and yes they were biopsied...then a wise man has
to stop in his tracks and realize that it wasn't just chance or luck.

When Dr. Seymour Brenner, M.D. FACR, saw a metastatic lung cancer
patient return to his office long after Brenner had presumed the
patient was dead, Brenner stopped in his tracks. The patient was cancer
free.

Although Brenner had the largest radiation oncology practice in the US
at that time, he had never seen a reversal like this in over 30 years
of practice...so he went to see Revici himself to find out what was up.
Revici showed him more cases...a pancreatic patient...another lung
cancer patient.

Brenner arranged to meet with Revici again. Revici showed him more
cases. Brenner called various hospitals and physicians who verified the
biopsy diagnoses.

Years later, Brenner, who was retired at this point, wrote that he had
seen many cases of incurable cancer that Revici had cured.

Yet Revici had been vilified by JAMA and by Barrett both editions of
his book entitled "The Health Robbers." I call it his book although he
is supposedly just the editor, because his chapter called "The
Cruellest Killers" claims two authors in the first version and two
DIFFERENT authors in the second version ALTHOUGH BOTH CHAPTERS ARE
ALMOST IDENTICAL... in other words Barrett wrote the chapter and put
four other people's names on it.

Barrett defamed Revici with his chapter heading...

So it's clear that there is no fair playing field. Characters like
Barrett have poisoned the well. And you've bought it, maybe because you
thought you could rely on Barrett's 'authors.'

And you thought you could trust JAMA perhaps. But JAMA's Lyall Report
on the Revici Method is a scandal of historic proportions...its right
up there with the Korean cloning scandal of recent days.

Without rehashing 100 pages of the answer to Lyall's fraud (his report
was two pages, the answer was 100 pages), it might be helpful to know
that the so-called authors of the report held all their meetings at the
International Press Club. Based on the bar tab, there was enough booze
served to give each attendee 3 alcoholic drinks on one ocasion and
seven drinks on another!

When every cancer doctor has only one or maybe two outstanding results,
but one doctor has hundreds of amazing reversals of incurable patients,
it's time to stop in your tracks. Brenner did. He saw it with his own
eyes.

But you didn't see it with your own eyes. So you relied on Barrett and
JAMA. And you were lied to...bigtime.

This scandal is too large and outrageous to waste any more time setting
up so-called studies, that can no longer be trusted. Revici was
successful 50 years ago, waiting for more studies would merely be
another attempt to sweep the monumental travesty under the
carpet...there would be too much liability for JAMA for them to stand
idly by while their organization would be crushed and
humiliated...their credibility forever deflated into the category of
the Globe Weekly.

Brenner saw it, and I saw it, too. You ought to get your *** on a
plane and visit the Revici center and see it for yourself.

PS. Revici is merely one way to cure cancer with natural cures. So many
have gotten screwed over by the likes of Barrett and others. But go to
the Revici clinic and see one method for yourself. You will never read
about it in a journal...you've got to examine it with your own eyes and
brain.

First I must tell you that I'm drinking wine as I write this...not
something I do very often...only a little can make me tipsy, all while
I feel brilliant...so there may be omissions and typing errors...so I'd
like a second swing of the bat if necessary. My apologies for presuming
on your good graces...but I didn't want to delay a response to your
requests.


Now why is it that we won't read about the Revici treatment in a medical
journal, not even those alternative journals that have published results
from Gerson, Hoxsey, Kelley/Gonzales, Hoffer, Pauling, Holt?

There is a long answer to this because there are so many parts. My book
expends 100 pages to answer the question. Here is the much abbreviated
answer.

Revici's work with AIDS was published in the Townsend Letter for
Doctors when Revici was 87 years old.

You might not have known that Revici died in 1998 (at the age of 101
years old). He lost all interest in attempting to be published after
the fraudulent report published in JAMA in 1965. The scope of the fraud
perpetrated against Revici puts the recent Korean cloning fraud to
shame. Revici believed that his name was irreparably damaged in the
minds of peer reviewers from that point on.

In 1965, Revici was already 67 years old, and been nearly killed in two
World Wars...and been put in an iron lung at one point. One can forgive
him after all that for losing energy in trying to appease organizations
far larger than a solitary independent researcher and discoverer. (He'd
already faced Hitler's Nazi's literally the floor above him in a
mansion in occupied France. They literally heard the boots of the
officers on the floor above them. Revici, a Jew by birth, learned when
to fight and when to lay low. He and his family fled France over night
after a tip from the Paris chief of police. This type of trauma can
impact one's subsequent behavior.)

Revici incorrectly held the belief that the superiority of his
discoveries would automatically "rise to the top" despite forces far
larger than his that were in opposition to his efforts.

Prior to the sad event of the 1965 JAMA fraud, "Angiology" and
"Otolaryngology" did publish research by Revici and by Dr. Bernard
Welt, M.D. The Pasteur Institute also published five papers by Dr.
Revici in 1938-39. In those papers, Revice demonstrated how
pathological pain* was related to cancer (and other lipid imbalances),
along with his early success in treating refractory cancer.

*Pathological pain is different from external stimulus pain. It can be
tracked to the pH of the lesion and to the pH of urine, depending on
the lipid imbalance of the particular patient. Catabolic imbalances
track oneway while anabolic imbalances track in the opposite direction.

This is a
priori evidence that the overall results of the method are not good enough
to encourage the practitioners to want to open their books to general
examination.

Revici did open his results to many physicians. And doctors who had
seen his results were often quite enthusiastic about what they had
seen. Their independent enthusiam was no match for the impact of the
1965 fraud published in JAMA and sent out to 100,000 subscribers or
more, however.

I think that any sane, moral person who believed they had an important
cancer treatment would try to move Heaven and earth to publicise their
results.. Gonzales published about a mere eleven patients and now there
is a 1.3 million dollar trial in progress comparing his version of the
Kelley treatment to chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Revici did his best. He was not an expert at public relations, only at
science and treating patients. After 1965, he decided that his work
would overcome all...he would focus on what he was good at:
research...and the world would beat a path to his door.

It will some day. If you rely on the fall back position to reject his
work because he hasn't achieved acceptance at this point, that approach
would allow you to dismiss any discovery that hasn't experienced quick
acceptance...for instance, you would have rejected Semmelweis's
sanitation discovery using the same criteria.

It is time to stop giving those making cancer cure claims the benefit of the
doubt, as you are. They should be made to put up or shut up.

How can a deceased doctor meet your demands? Meanwhile, with 30 years
of practice, Dr. Seymour Brenner, FACR [he headed the largest radiation
oncology clinic in the US with 1,000 appointments a week at his two NY
offices] said he'd never seen the kind of results that Revici had
achieved in the treatment of advanced cancer.

Dr. Brenner was merely the last individual physician to be stunned by
Revici's accomplishments. Immediately prior to World War II, two
stellar French physicians also were highly impressed.

Gustave Freeman, MD, was yet another. [Freeman had over 100 peer review
journal publication credits to his name.] Freeman credits John
Clements, M.D., discovery of surfactants to Revici's long-held
importance of surface tension in bioological function. Freeman related
to Clements, Revici's position on surface tension. Clements later told
Freeman that it was that discussion that enabled him to make his own
discovery, which has resulted so far in Clements' winning the Lasker
Award and the Trudeau Society prize and an honorary Swiss
professorship.

Professor Gerhard Schrauzer, with over 300 peer review publications to
his credit and editor of 'Biological Elements Trace Research', was of
the opinion that Revici was a true genius, and comparied Revici to
Hippocrates, Galen and Paracelsus.

So I'd suggest that your demand that the information be presented to
you in a preset format that fits your preconceived notion of 'how it
should be done'...namely published in a peer review journal...just
isn't going to happen. Yet the inability to meet your specific
publishing requirement does not lessen the importance of Revici's many
profound discoveries.

The time
was never riper. It was never easier to demonstrate and follow up cancer,
and hundreds of thousands of suitable patients are passing through the hands
of alternative cancer practitioners every year. What do we see for this
vast amount of medical experimentation? Next to nothing.

The late Revici can't come back from the grave to comply with your
desire in the format you prefer. The clinic that remains is absorbed in
treating patients, and incapable of meeting the standards of peer
review publication.

Tell the Revici people to send me a few of their best, well-documented,
cases, if they want. You can usually tell how sincere and reliable they
are from the quality of the testimonials and case reports.

I wrote the book 10 years ago. I am not in contact with the clinic
except on rare occasion, maybe two or three times in the last five
years. How about this...assert a little initiative and go do it
yourself. His discoveries will reward your curiosity far beyond your
fondest imagination.

If you've ever been truly curious about how the human body evolved [and
all biological life]...not Darwin's well meaning but erroneous
explanation but a sound hypothesis that appears to explain far more
than Darwin's Theory...you'll want to explore what Revici has to offer.


What I've written here barely scratches the surface. I wish I could
recall the physician's name, [I found it: Dr. Arnold Cronk] but he was
the head of research for Johnson & Johnson. He once said that Revici's
many discoveries would keep an entire graduating class from medical
school occupied for the rest of their lives. That's quite an
endorsement of praise...and quite a rich pool teeming with rewards for
those who dip their nets.

Let me give you an example. Professor Mark Noble, a neuro researcher
focusing on cancer once saw the dust jacket of my book with photos of a
disappearing tumor on the cover [the photo was an example of a cure
that Dr. Lyall lied about in the JAMA fraud article]. So Noble read
the book, became fascinated and went to the Revici clinic to find out
more.

To make a long story short, as a direct result he has altered his
research efforts almost entirely. If you do a search on Noble's work,
you'll see that his previous resume is nothing to sneeze at. I beleive
he is at the University of Syracuse or is doing research at some
research facility in Syracuse. You might contact him by first doing a
google search. [He might be the best, most knowledgeable person at this
late date, since most of the people familiar with Revici's work over
the years are probably deceased or quite old.]

You'll have to sacrifice your desire for seeing Revici's work published
in a peer review journal...he's dead...and the clinic is incapable of
doing what you are asking for. But that inability will become a small
shortcoming once your vista is flooded with the rich discoveries that
will unfold for you...just as it has for Drs. Schrauzer, Freeman,
Clements, Noble, etc, etc...or the 14 Nobel laureates who were on the
board of trustees of an international scientific society that chose
Revici as its recipient as scientist of the year.

No, the discoveries didn't come forward in the format you were trained
to accept...but they have come forward, nonetheless...it's up to you
whether you'll be able to take advantage of them...the rewards are
almost limitless...while missing out almost a crime if one is able to
appreciate the treasures awaiting.


Peter Moran

www.cancerwatcher.com

.