Re: More about me


Peter Moran wrote:
Repost, dealing with some grammatical and spelling errors. I should wait
for the coffee to kick in, when its 5.30 am.

I still think Moran is a money-grubbing elitist with an agenda,
otherwise he wouldn't be here peddling chemo on mha.

PeterB

I am happy to let people judge for themselves. Most people already know or
suspect that there is something not quite right about so many people
claiming to be able to cure cancer, but somehow not being able to produce
any body of convincingly cured cases.

You've never published yours, and I've looked at your website. Your
comments about a "suggested cure rate" are nothing more than survival
data disguised as intervention, a ridiculous claim. As for Clark, I
know she's your favorite poster child for quack medicine, but you can't
lay all your condemnation at the feet of one practicioner. And you
haven't shown that chemo is effective in terms of "evidence based"
criteria in the majority of patients. Do post a reference showing how
conventional methods works to treat the majority of cancer patients.
When asked for this previously, you offered rambling commentary on your
website and a dissertation on dietary protocols (ie., a straw man.) I
want to see data on the effects of chemo by stage and type of cancer
and how this improves prognosis long term. Your sponsors have had
thirty years to come up with this. What's the problem? Use of some
sort of control group would be your only legitimate defense that
"evidence based" medicine was your standard. The charge that this
would be unethical is absurd. I'm not talking about patients denied
"effective" treatment, I'm talking about those who didn't get chemo and
died -- such people certainly exist. I know you will again decline
because you have done so repeatedly and it proves you're only purpose
here is perpetuating the myth that modern oncology is working.


I am trying to get you idiots to stop whining about me and the sceptics and
put a little pressure where it belongs, on the claimants you support. You
or a loved one may have cancer one day and you won't want to be wasting
precious time and family resources on crap, as you most certainly will, as
things stand.

Chemo is crap in the majority of cancer patients, unless you can prove
otherwise.

The alternative cancer industry has used the tactic of whining about
doctor's obstructionism for about a century. It is a self-serving
marketplace ploy, but you can't seem to see that, can you? At least
recognise that the tactic is not working to validate any of their methods
and that in the present climate of support for alternative medicine in high
places, the time is NOW for that industry to show its mettle, if it has one.
They can't all be wimps, sociopaths, or reclusive geniuses.

Your sponsors are not doctors, they are the drug makers. We don't
blame the doctors, unless they tow the line for obvious baloney like
yours.

I have issued a simple challenge on my web site, for those who don't
understand how to do basic prospective clinical studies.

You and FDA have had thirty years to bring chemo out of "experimental"
use and you have the balls to demand evidence from everyone else. You
make me want to puke.

PeterB

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Chemo Fog?
    ... there is actually something called chemo fog. ... Chemotherapy Fog Is No Longer Ignored as Illusion ... On an Internet chat room popular with breast cancer survivors, ... Abrupt menopause, which often follows treatment, also leaves many women ...
    (alt.support.arthritis)
  • Play the Odds: Supplements and Chemo
    ... Play the Odds: Supplements and Chemo ... Drug Information Specialist, BC Cancer Agency ... what herbs and supplements could do to this balance. ...
    (sci.med.diseases.cancer)
  • Re: Chemo Fog?
    ... there is actually something called chemo fog. ... Chemotherapy Fog Is No Longer Ignored as Illusion ... On an Internet chat room popular with breast cancer survivors, ... Abrupt menopause, which often follows treatment, also leaves many women ...
    (alt.support.arthritis)
  • Chemo Fog?
    ... there is actually something called chemo fog. ... On an Internet chat room popular with breast cancer survivors, ... chemo brain into a stand-up comedy act. ... Abrupt menopause, which often follows treatment, also leaves many women ...
    (alt.support.arthritis)
  • Re: CT/PET scan results (STEPH) question
    ... and really see no evidence other than a rising CEA of any new cancer ... They said they saw "mild focal hypermetabolic activity in the ... it goes that is due to problems of diahrea and constipation from chemo. ... this correlates with numerous diverticula seen on ...
    (sci.med.diseases.cancer)