Re: A message for Peter Moran, et al


<awthrawthr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143605258.797253.148730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Although some might think so, I don't believe your ignorance regarding
natural cures is due to monetary greed...although certainly the drug
industry and the radiation manufacturers are interested in maximizing
their profits with the fallout that patients are being unmercifully and
ignorantly killed by the minute.

Likewise, surgeons do make most of their money by performing surgery.
But that is not to imply that you're evilly sitting around plotting how
to maim patients for their money.

At the same time, I have interviewed people who were going to die from
the cancers in weeks or months (one was in a coma before she recovered
due to natural medicine.) One patient was a Harvard grad who also
graduated from Yale Medical School. At the age of 29 he came down with
a biopsy result of an undifferentiated brain tumor. He was told he had
two to four months to live. He wrote every medical expert he knew...and
he knew quite a few. They had no solution for him. So he went to see
Dr. Emanuel Revici, someone that Stephen Barrett considers to be a
quack (based on a false report published in JAMA.)

Dr. Fishbein, the brain tumor victim, has survived cancer-free for more
than forty years! There are many more true stories like this
one...patients who were given no chance, but who have been cancer free
for a long time. Every cancer doctor hopefully has one patient he can
point to that defied the odds (usually that one patient was using
natural cures alongside whatever the doctor had prescribed.)

But when a doctor has scores of incredible cures of patients who were
supposedly incurable...and yes they were biopsied...then a wise man has
to stop in his tracks and realize that it wasn't just chance or luck.

When Dr. Seymour Brenner, M.D. FACR, saw a metastatic lung cancer
patient return to his office long after Brenner had presumed the
patient was dead, Brenner stopped in his tracks. The patient was cancer
free.

Although Brenner had the largest radiation oncology practice in the US
at that time, he had never seen a reversal like this in over 30 years
of practice...so he went to see Revici himself to find out what was up.
Revici showed him more cases...a pancreatic patient...another lung
cancer patient.

Brenner arranged to meet with Revici again. Revici showed him more
cases. Brenner called various hospitals and physicians who verified the
biopsy diagnoses.

Years later, Brenner, who was retired at this point, wrote that he had
seen many cases of incurable cancer that Revici had cured.

Yet Revici had been vilified by JAMA and by Barrett both editions of
his book entitled "The Health Robbers." I call it his book although he
is supposedly just the editor, because his chapter called "The
Cruellest Killers" claims two authors in the first version and two
DIFFERENT authors in the second version ALTHOUGH BOTH CHAPTERS ARE
ALMOST IDENTICAL... in other words Barrett wrote the chapter and put
four other people's names on it.

Barrett defamed Revici with his chapter heading...

So it's clear that there is no fair playing field. Characters like
Barrett have poisoned the well. And you've bought it, maybe because you
thought you could rely on Barrett's 'authors.'

And you thought you could trust JAMA perhaps. But JAMA's Lyall Report
on the Revici Method is a scandal of historic proportions...its right
up there with the Korean cloning scandal of recent days.

Without rehashing 100 pages of the answer to Lyall's fraud (his report
was two pages, the answer was 100 pages), it might be helpful to know
that the so-called authors of the report held all their meetings at the
International Press Club. Based on the bar tab, there was enough booze
served to give each attendee 3 alcoholic drinks on one ocasion and
seven drinks on another!

When every cancer doctor has only one or maybe two outstanding results,
but one doctor has hundreds of amazing reversals of incurable patients,
it's time to stop in your tracks. Brenner did. He saw it with his own
eyes.

But you didn't see it with your own eyes. So you relied on Barrett and
JAMA. And you were lied to...bigtime.

This scandal is too large and outrageous to waste any more time setting
up so-called studies, that can no longer be trusted. Revici was
successful 50 years ago, waiting for more studies would merely be
another attempt to sweep the monumental travesty under the
carpet...there would be too much liability for JAMA for them to stand
idly by while their organization would be crushed and
humiliated...their credibility forever deflated into the category of
the Globe Weekly.

Brenner saw it, and I saw it, too. You ought to get your *** on a
plane and visit the Revici center and see it for yourself.

PS. Revici is merely one way to cure cancer with natural cures. So many
have gotten screwed over by the likes of Barrett and others. But go to
the Revici clinic and see one method for yourself. You will never read
about it in a journal...you've got to examine it with your own eyes and
brain.

Now why is it that we won't read about the Revici treatment in a medical
journal, not even those alternative journals that have published results
from Gerson, Hoxsey, Kelley/Gonzales, Hoffer, Pauling, Holt? This is a
priori evidence that the overall results of the method are not good enough
to encourage the practitioners to want to open their books to general
examination.

I think that any sane, moral person who believed they had an important
cancer treatment would try to move Heaven and earth to publicise their
results.. Gonzales published about a mere eleven patients and now there
is a 1.3 million dollar trial in progress comparing his version of the
Kelley treatment to chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

It is time to stop giving those making cancer cure claims the benefit of the
doubt, as you are. They should be made to put up or shut up. The time
was never riper. It was never easier to demonstrate and follow up cancer,
and hundreds of thousands of suitable patients are passing through the hands
of alternative cancer practitioners every year. What do we see for this
vast amount of medical experimentation? Next to nothing.

Tell the Revici people to send me a few of their best, well-documented,
cases, if they want. You can usually tell how sincere and reliable they
are from the quality of the testimonials and case reports.

Peter Moran

www.cancerwatcher.com


.