Re: A message for Peter Moran, et al


Peter Moran wrote:
I am happy to let people judge for themselves. Most people already know or
suspect that there is something not quite right about sp many people
claiming to be able to cure cancer, but somehow not being able to produce
any body of convincingly cured cases.

Then post a reference showing how conventional methods works to treat
the majority of cancer patients. When asked for this previously, you
offered rambling commentary on your website and a dissertation on
dietary protocols (ie., a straw man.) I want to see data on the effects
of chemo by stage and type of cancer and how this improves prognosis
long term. Your sponsors have had thirty years to come up with this.
What's the problem? Use of some sort of control group would be your
only legitimate defense that "evidence based" medicine was your
standard. The charge that this would be unethical is absurd. I'm not
talking about patients denied "effective" treatment, I'm talking about
those who didn't get chemo and died -- such people certainly exist. I
know you will again decline because you have done so repeatedly and it
proves you're only purpose here is perpetuating the myth that modern
oncology is working.

I am trying to get you idiots to put the pressure where it belongs, on
behalf of cancer sufferers, and yourself if you ever get cancer and don't
want to waste time and family resources on crap.

Chemo is crap in the majority of cancer patients, unless you can prove
it isn't. You have repeatedly declined to offer any such evidence.

Use market and
information pressureto put the onus back where it belongs, on the claimants.
Hulda Clark PhD has, for example, been promising to publish some results for
years, but never will.

You've never published yours, and I've looked at your website. Your
comments about a "suggested cure rate" are nothing more than survival
data disguised as intervention, a ridiculous claim. As for Clark, I
know she's your favorite poster child for quack medicine, but you can't
lay all your condemnation at the feet of one practicioner. And you
haven't shown that chemo is effective in terms of "evidence based"
criteria in the majority of patients.


The alternativecancer industry has used the tactic of whining about doctor's
obstructionism for about a century.

Your sponsors are not doctors, they are the drug makers. We don't
blame the doctors, unless they tow the line for obvious baloney like
yours.

It is a self-serving marketplace ploy,
but you can't seem to see that, can you?

I see that you don't have an honest bone in your body.

At least recognise that the tactic
is not working to validate any of their methods and that in the present
climate of support for alternative medicine in high places, the time is NOW
for that industry to show its mettle, if it has one.

You and FDA have had thirty years to bring chemo out of "experimental"
use and you have the balls to demand evidence from Dr. Rath (which he
DOES provide.) You make me want to puke.

PeterB

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Chemo Fog?
    ... there is actually something called chemo fog. ... Chemotherapy Fog Is No Longer Ignored as Illusion ... On an Internet chat room popular with breast cancer survivors, ... Abrupt menopause, which often follows treatment, also leaves many women ...
    (alt.support.arthritis)
  • Play the Odds: Supplements and Chemo
    ... Play the Odds: Supplements and Chemo ... Drug Information Specialist, BC Cancer Agency ... what herbs and supplements could do to this balance. ...
    (sci.med.diseases.cancer)
  • Re: Chemo Fog?
    ... there is actually something called chemo fog. ... Chemotherapy Fog Is No Longer Ignored as Illusion ... On an Internet chat room popular with breast cancer survivors, ... Abrupt menopause, which often follows treatment, also leaves many women ...
    (alt.support.arthritis)
  • Chemo Fog?
    ... there is actually something called chemo fog. ... On an Internet chat room popular with breast cancer survivors, ... chemo brain into a stand-up comedy act. ... Abrupt menopause, which often follows treatment, also leaves many women ...
    (alt.support.arthritis)
  • Re: CT/PET scan results (STEPH) question
    ... and really see no evidence other than a rising CEA of any new cancer ... They said they saw "mild focal hypermetabolic activity in the ... it goes that is due to problems of diahrea and constipation from chemo. ... this correlates with numerous diverticula seen on ...
    (sci.med.diseases.cancer)