Re: Wild Claims
- From: "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 06:09:57 GMT
"Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mN1Wf.12193$WK1.4674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"cathyb" <cathybeesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143515012.618814.190890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jan Drew wrote:
"Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message<snip>
news:810Wf.16881$%d.1913@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:sx_Vf.60016$H71.51047@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A 8kb of off-topic shit.
Jan's still not getting any, then.
What's amazing is
What is typical is the subject became *Jan*
Here comes the same old excuses.....
that she actually believes that anybody is going to bother
to try to make any sense of her long, scattered collections of quotes and
exclamations and accusations. In the past, I've tried to answer them
point-by-point,
Talk about *wild claims*
Rich has done no such thing.
but I've come to realize that nobody except Jan is going to
bother to read my efforts at rebuttal, and she can't comprehend what she
reads, so, why bother?
So.......
Let the wild claims rip..............................
After all, YOU have claimed...................
No "proof" is necessary, because every reader of this group knows that what
I say is true.
--Rich
It is noted, YOU have overlooked and NOT replied to my post asking you if
you would admit if Mark lied!!!!
YOU.. in particular wouldn't want to admit the below is a lie, would you,
Rich?
*A study was posted in ASAD which Jan never responded to, but was in the
thread, that just the opposite is true. I posted several studies showing
that treatment prevents abuse.
Jan does not want to hear that, and sticks her head in her rectum*.
See below For my response:
http://tinyurl.com/q5a7k
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wild Claims
- From: Rich
- Re: Wild Claims
- References:
- Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- From: PeterB
- Re: Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- From: Sdores
- Re: Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- From: PeterB
- Re: Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- From: C A III A
- Re: Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- From: PeterB
- Re: Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- From: PeterB
- Re: Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- From: Mark Probert
- Wild Claims
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: Wild Claims
- From: Jan Drew
- Re: Wild Claims
- From: cathyb
- Re: Wild Claims
- From: Rich
- Greater Regulation of Nutritional Supplements Not Justified (But You Must Take Action To Prevent It)
- Prev by Date: Re: Itchy skin
- Next by Date: Re: Stephen Barret renames Quackwatch...
- Previous by thread: Re: Wild Claims
- Next by thread: Re: Wild Claims
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|