Re: Cappaccino urine, which leaves frothy bubbles in toilet bowl


"Carole" <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:441e9915$0$23173$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"cathyb" <cathybeesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1142770857.462201.61410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Carole wrote:
"cathyb" <cathybeesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1142766522.636450.157580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Carole wrote:

An "in" joke ...perhaps with sexual connotations?

Just say no to the sugar.

Is that what you do Cathy?
Are you fat and have to cut down on calories?

Hm. You don't get the reference, so you have a go at childhood
insults?

Carole, you're exposing your personality more and more, and it really
isn't nice.

I'm just following in your lead Cathy. All you ever do is put downs.
So how do you like it?

You consider 'fat' a put-down, do you Carole? And nonetheless use it?

Nice.

As a mother (yes, I know you apparently consider that a put-down as
well), if you were my child, you'd be in big trouble for your
behaviour.

Your personality is pretty poor too Cathy.
All you do is snear and use putdowns.
Who is interested in what you would see fit to do to some poor
unsuspecting
child that you considered wasn't behaving in the manner you see fit?

All I've seen you do in this ng is put people down starting with John
Gohde,
and myself and anybody who is into alternative medicine.

The bigot and you and others get put down for making absurd "scientific"
statements that conflict with observable reality. And of course in John's
case, for appalingly filthy bigotry.


Yes, I know that I haven't done science beyond Year 8, which is because I
did a commercial course. I don't see that is any reason to ridicule me and
make fun of my ideas.

The reason to make fun of your ideas is that your ideas are about science
and they are wrong. I am illiterate in the subject of 18th century French
poetry. For that reason, I do not spout high-fallutin' declarations about
that subject in newsgroups. Were I to do so, I would thoroughly deserve "put
downs."




And I'd like you to show where I said I believed in David Icke's
reptilians.
I do believe a lot of Icke's stuff but not the reptilians, so you made
that
up. All I've ever said about the reptilian idea was I considered it a bit
far fetched.

I don't see how you can criticise me when you don't show any better
example.
What makes you so superior?

What makes her superior is that she knows about science. Of course that only
means superior in scientific knowledge. But she has never claimed to be
superior in any other way.
--


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/


.

Relevant Pages