Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?


"Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b1GJf.7327$Z3.5901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Carole" <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43f726b3$0$17122$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Mark Probert" <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%slJf.119$qT6.79@xxxxxxxxxxx
Carole wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:W5aJf.72$Q02.30@xxxxxxxxxxx
Carole wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:XKKEf.1655$MF1.3@xxxxxxxxxxx
Tim Campbell wrote:
Mark Probert wrote:

Careful, Vernon, Chuckie is a fake doctor.

Whether he is fake or not what he says makes more sense that most
of
what I see around here.
We know that. And, I do feel compassion for you for feeling that
way.
Don't listen to Mark Probert. He is one of the suppressors of
innovation, a
DISINFORMATION agent.
Bull***. I am more of a supporter of free speech than anyone you
will
ever meet.

Yes, but you don't believe in alternative medicine or conspiracies,
right?

I believe in *E*vidence *B*ased *M*edicine, not *A*necdote *B*ased
*M*edicine. That does not make me a bad person, does it? Am I not
entitled to a different opinion?

Vitamin C prevents scurvey, vitamin B1 prevents beri beri, vitamin d
prevents rickets, folic acid prevents spina bifeda.

All true.


Or maybe the drug companies can find a drug to prevent all these
diseases.

No, but some drug companies produce vitamin supplements.

I have heard that the price of vitamin C is manipulated between drug
companies. That it costs a fraction of what it gets to the consumer and
there is no justification for the price. Just imagine what will happen if
codex alimentarius becomes law. Something that costs us $10 for 100 tablets
will for some vague reason become $30, $50 or $100 all because of the "high
cost of overseeing safety and integrity of the product" and "concern for the
consumer".

I feel nothing but contempt for drug companies and think they are one of the
scourges of the planet, their objective is money and nothing else.


Do you think there is much research into nutritional remedies, and who
would
do it?

The effects of the vitamins you mention were proven by . . . wait for it .
..
. "much research."


I don't believe there was much research, because there has been research
into cellsalts done already and it has been discounted by mainstream.
Therefore mainstream is rigged.

Would pharmaceutical companies be interestsed in nutritional remedies?

Those that produce supplements are.

Would Merck be interested in producing nutritional remedies?
A: Yes, if they could get the price high enough - ENTER CONDEX ALIMENTARIUS.


Why are oncologists the only people allowed to treat cancer, yet they
have
a
high failure rate?

They also have a high success rate. The medical intervention known as
Advanced Cardiac Life Support has a much higher failure rate, but if you
are
in cardiac arrest, you'll want it done.


If real remedies weren't suppressed nobody would get to the stage where they
would need such intervention in the first place.


Are they really safe and effective?

They are as safe as they can manage to be, and they are certainly more
effective than any "alternative" treatments for cancer.


Sure, keep on kidding yourself.
Its like the fat person who goes to get lipo suction instead of following a
healthy diet and exercise.
"Oh, lipo suction is more effective than a proper diet and sensible
lifestyle."

You can't call intervention to save a person's life - when a person has
followed a faulty diet diet for many years - as the best remedy for
anything. Its intervention to save a person's life. Once their life is saved
if they don't get onto a better regime they won't last long, and their life
will have been brought back from the brink for nothing.

Carole
http://www.conspiracee.com
http://www.cellsalts.net





.