Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?


"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fghau1tifvuial77gacb29gb57upsnjdp5@xxxxxxxxxx
"vernon" <here@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pd79u1h1a5h4stbrdbqttci166lh8ra8r2@xxxxxxxxxx
"vernon" <here@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


"David Wright" <wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:odVEf.10540$NS6.9664@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <2fUEf.16$Np6.4@xxxxxxxx>,
Mark Probert <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
vernon wrote:
"Peter Moran" <pmoranATbordernet.com.au> wrote in message
news:43e3c727$0$19685$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"vernon" <here@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43e28297$0$5554$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<drceephd2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138915390.791390.129570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sounds to me like she did what most people do.

She went to her allopathic MD, an oncologist, and he treated her
until
near death. When the oncologist told her that there was nothing
more
he could do for or to her, she then decided to try an alternative
approach. What chance would you give the alternative treatment
after
all the oncologist would have done to her?

Had she died at the oncologist's hands nothing would have been
said
since over 300,000 people die that way every year.

The only viable way to go is alternative first, not as a last
resort.
If the alternative treatment does not work, at least you will be
in
better health and physical condition for what the MD oncologist
will
do
to you.

DrC PhD

True.
An MD can be consulted for tests
Strong cancer treatments are counter (DESTROY) to alternative
methods.
Anyone who undergoes traditional cancer treatments is very seldom
a
candidate for alternative methods.
Blaming the poor outcomes from alternative methods on prior
conventional
treatments holds no water unless it is already known the method
works
when
used by itself. . Where is the evidence for that?

Without such evidence you have no case. You are introducing a
second
completely unproven hypothesis to explain the very obvious fact,
and
one
that you evidently admit, that at least most of the time
"alternatives"
have no effect whatsoever on cancer.

Get an education.

Peter has an education plus thirty years experience.

There are alternative methods that always work on some cancers.

Can you provide proof in the form of a documented and verifiable case
study where:

1) The existence of cancer is documented by appropriate histology
studies.

2) The patient underwent only one alternative treatment, and no
conventional treatment.

3) The patient is disease free several years after cessation of all
treatment.

There are traditional methods that sometimes work on some cancers.

In the pediatric realm, sometimes translates to over 90% in many case.

In the skin cancer realm, surgery works nearly 100% of the time on
basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. (Malignant melanoma is
another story, of course.)


Carcinoma is most often taken care of with liquid nitrogen freezing now
days.
It isn't skin cancer.

Do you know what the word "carcinoma" means?


An invasive malignant tumor derived from epithelial tissue that tends to
metastasize to other areas of the body.
Any other questions?

Yes. Do you know what the expression "invasive malignant tumor" means?


"tends to" "Sometimes"

"tends to metastasize"

"Tends To" does not mean it does. It is just probable and barely over 50%.

You flat out refuse to read "tends to"


Do you know what the word "metastasize" means?


Do you know when it is called cancer?

Some time before it starts to metastasize, I believe.

When it grows and doesn't remain stable is the USUAL definition.
Don't get me wrong. Carcinoma should zapped (literally with present
techniques.)
The advancements of treatment were.

Cut (to kill and remove the cells)
Electrical burning. (to kill and remove the cells)
Nitrogen freezing. (to kill and remove the cells)

Now if anyone here goes to a doctor and they "cut" as the first line of
defense, ask why. If they don't know or don't do the other techniques (MUCH
safer) find a new doctor.

Oh, we don't want to take away any pity parties for those with Carsenoma
lesions who want to tell all their freinds they have CANCER and need prayer.




Do you know what cancer means?

Next thing we will hear is that all warts are cancer because some are.

It is often (not always) a precursor to cancer and
thus should be taken care of ASAP.

--


.

Relevant Pages

  • Not exactly vacination helps to eliminate cancer cells
    ... effective future treatment for cancer, ... destroy cancer cells, leaving healthy cells intact. ... that the treatment would have fewer side-effects than chemotherapy. ... The treatment was tested on two groups of mice with cancerous tumours. ...
    (soc.culture.usa)
  • Rotational Field Nuclear Quantum Magnetic Resonance
    ... Don't know if it's any different from Radio frequency ablation ... In a development, which may bring a new ray of hope for cancer patients, ... malignant cells without affecting the adjacent healthy ones. ... As per the new treatment developed by the institute, ...
    (sci.med.diseases.cancer)
  • Re: Greedy Doctors
    ... finding "noteworthy cases of survival" among cancer patients using the ... Hoxsey herbal treatment. ... The face of cancer treatment may soon become almost ... alternative-medicine movement in American history. ...
    (soc.culture.singapore)
  • Re: Cancer "curers" miss out again
    ... Chemotherapy is one of three main treatment protocols of conventional medicine, one which millions of people worldwide have been put through. ... Lately, a recent study in Britain has raised serious questions about chemotherapy, in particular the role it plays in hastening and even causing the death of late-stage cancer sufferers. ... The study had been carried out by the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Deaths in Britain, whose members are mostly taken from British medical royal colleges. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Podnoszenie odpornosci usuwa raka!
    ... Bee venom destroys cancer cells in tests on mice ... that the treatment would have fewer side-effects than chemotherapy. ... The treatment was tested on two groups of mice with cancerous tumours. ...
    (soc.culture.polish)
Loading