Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: "Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 05:16:56 GMT
<rich.@> wrote in message news:7tc8u1p6nup6gd938bhtm20n461uvdjku6@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:26:43 -0700, "vernon" <here@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carcinoma is most often taken care of with liquid nitrogen freezing now
days.
False. Actinic keratoses which are precancerous lesions are removed by
liquid nitrogen. Carcinoma is cancer and never removed with just
liquid nitrogen. Where do you get your information from?
It isn't skin cancer. It is often (not always) a precursor to cancer and
thus should be taken care of ASAP.
Carcinoma is not a precursor to cancer. Carcinoma *is* cancer.
Carcinoma is a generic term for a cancer that begins in skin or
tissues that line the inside of the outside of internal organs.
Aloha,
Rich
Is it just me, or does Vernon's "education" seem a little thin in places?
--
--Rich
Recommended websites:
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/
.
- References:
- Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: Robert
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: Peter Moran
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: vernon
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: David Wright
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: vernon
- Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- Prev by Date: Re: Glyconutrients
- Next by Date: LIAR Richard H Jacobson
- Previous by thread: Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- Next by thread: Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|