Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: "vernon" <here@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:26:43 -0700
"David Wright" <wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:odVEf.10540$NS6.9664@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <2fUEf.16$Np6.4@xxxxxxxx>,
Mark Probert <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
vernon wrote:
"Peter Moran" <pmoranATbordernet.com.au> wrote in message
news:43e3c727$0$19685$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"vernon" <here@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43e28297$0$5554$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<drceephd2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageBlaming the poor outcomes from alternative methods on prior
news:1138915390.791390.129570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sounds to me like she did what most people do.True.
She went to her allopathic MD, an oncologist, and he treated her
until
near death. When the oncologist told her that there was nothing more
he could do for or to her, she then decided to try an alternative
approach. What chance would you give the alternative treatment after
all the oncologist would have done to her?
Had she died at the oncologist's hands nothing would have been said
since over 300,000 people die that way every year.
The only viable way to go is alternative first, not as a last resort.
If the alternative treatment does not work, at least you will be in
better health and physical condition for what the MD oncologist will
do
to you.
DrC PhD
An MD can be consulted for tests
Strong cancer treatments are counter (DESTROY) to alternative methods.
Anyone who undergoes traditional cancer treatments is very seldom a
candidate for alternative methods.
conventional
treatments holds no water unless it is already known the method works
when
used by itself. . Where is the evidence for that?
Without such evidence you have no case. You are introducing a second
completely unproven hypothesis to explain the very obvious fact, and
one
that you evidently admit, that at least most of the time
"alternatives"
have no effect whatsoever on cancer.
Get an education.
Peter has an education plus thirty years experience.
There are alternative methods that always work on some cancers.
Can you provide proof in the form of a documented and verifiable case
study where:
1) The existence of cancer is documented by appropriate histology studies.
2) The patient underwent only one alternative treatment, and no
conventional treatment.
3) The patient is disease free several years after cessation of all
treatment.
There are traditional methods that sometimes work on some cancers.
In the pediatric realm, sometimes translates to over 90% in many case.
In the skin cancer realm, surgery works nearly 100% of the time on
basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. (Malignant melanoma is
another story, of course.)
Carcinoma is most often taken care of with liquid nitrogen freezing now
days.
It isn't skin cancer. It is often (not always) a precursor to cancer and
thus should be taken care of ASAP.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- References:
- Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: Robert
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: Peter Moran
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: vernon
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- From: David Wright
- Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- Prev by Date: Re: Glyconutrients
- Next by Date: Re: Glyconutrients
- Previous by thread: Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- Next by thread: Re: Why was Coretta King in Mexican clinic?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
