Re: Bill O'Neill exposed
- From: Mark Probert <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:43:20 -0500
JanD wrote:
"Mark Probert wrote:JanD wrote:Incorrect. Like I have told you in the past"Mark Probert" <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
JanD wrote:
"Peter Moran" <pmoranATbordernet.com.au> wrote in message news:43dda903$0$21221$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHere is an excellent example of Jan Drew
I was hoping Peter Bowditch would comment on this Canadian TV expose of this vicious, foul-mouthed, lying quack.
OOppss.
Jan Drew is not the subject.
Incorrect. What you have said in the past and NOW is GARBAGE!
That sentence sequence is immune to parsing ans it is self contradictory.
However, what I said in the past is as relevant today as it was when I first said it:
Like I have told you in the past, whenever you post, you become the subject. Here, you clearly are:
Here is an excellent example of Jan Drew playing Diversion Game. Instead of addressing the point that Dr. Moran made, about foul mouth Billy O'Neill being shown for a fraud, Jan atrtacks Peter Bowditch, who is only mentioned as he is a target of BO'N's foulness.
Mark Probert playing the diversion game.Nope.
YEP! LIAR!
No. I was addressing YOUR feeble diversion.
He is most guilty of his very own accusations!
That is certainly a well self-referential statement right here in this thread.
Do use a spell checker, Mark!
Yes, Ms. Drool.
BTW, Thunderbird just upgraded to a MW Word like spell checker.
Be that as it may, spelling flames are right above bigotry and race baiting in the scale of quality of arguments.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bill O'Neill exposed
- From: JanD
- Re: Bill O'Neill exposed
- References:
- Bill O'Neil exposed
- From: Peter Moran
- Re: Bill O'Neil exposed
- From: JanD
- Re: Bill O'Neil exposed
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Bill O'Neil exposed
- From: JanD
- Re: Bill O'Neil exposed
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Bill O'Neill exposed
- From: JanD
- Bill O'Neil exposed
- Prev by Date: Re: Study Pills
- Next by Date: Re: Bill O'Neil exposed
- Previous by thread: Re: Bill O'Neill exposed
- Next by thread: Re: Bill O'Neill exposed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|