Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- From: "vernon" <here@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:31:40 -0700
"JohnDoe" <dont@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43de35c8$0$12835$ba620dc5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> vernon wrote:
>
>> "Peter Moran" <pmoranATbordernet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:43dab6ad$0$9291$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>"vernon" <here@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:43da9405$0$28870$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>>"PeterB" <pkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>news:1138397241.374419.96160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>>Yes. See Nutritional Quality of Organic Versus Conventional Fruits,
>>>>>Vegetables, and Grains, published in The Journal of Alternative and
>>>>>Complimentary Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2001, 161-173. V. Worthington,
>>>>>2001. Nutrient levels in both organic and conventionally-grown foods
>>>>>were evaluated by reviewing data from 41 comparative studies on crops
>>>>>produced with organic matter and inorganic fertilisers. The study
>>>>>showed that organic crops yield higher average levels of some 21
>>>>>nutrients analysed. The results were most statistically significant for
>>>>>Vitamin C (27% more), magnesium (29%), iron (21%) and phosphorus (14%).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Scientific evidence supports the view that organically grown
>>>>>agriculture is more nutrient dense. in fact, organic produce is
>>>>>usually heavier per unit of mass than conventional grown foods, meaning
>>>>>you aren't really paying 15% more to buy organic, as those foods can be
>>>>>more filling.
>>>>>
>>>>>PeterB
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Proven again and again.
>>>
>>>? Including the "heavier per unit of mass"? That's truly ground
>>>breaking!.
>>>
>>>Peter Moran
>>
>>
>> Yes proven.
>> Of course it helps to have raised almost all vegetables and ground fruits
>> on a tiny truck farm in the black soil of Minnesota, using manure for
>> fertilizer. Much denser, even potatoes.
>
> Oh boy, first the definition PH goes over your head, and now you consider
> "heavier per unit of mass" to be proven. Dude, whatever you do, keep
> posting. You're hilarious! And I thought that Jehovah's Witness telling me
> that there are non-biological lifeforms was the funniest I ever saw! You
> beat him hands down.
You don't know what PH is.
You don't know what acidic means.
You have never raised any fruits or vegetables.
Go back to your 5th grade and start over.
Stupidity ALWAYS results in a shorter life. THAT'S proven also.
It's also PROVEN that the uneducated decline, mentally, quicker. (Education
is not necessarily formal schooling)
And before you make any further stupid statements, I probably have at LEAST
10 more years of University than you ever thought of having.
I am not a JW, but DEFINE non-biological life forms. You can't except in
whatever religion you belong.
Damn, get an education. What a buffoon.
Oh, I forgot. You are from another planet.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- From: JohnDoe
- Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- References:
- Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- From: PeterB
- Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- From: vernon
- Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- From: Peter Moran
- Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- From: vernon
- Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- From: JohnDoe
- Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- Prev by Date: Re: Bill O'Neill exposed
- Next by Date: Re: Thimerosal Study Reopens Debate on Safety of Vaccine
- Previous by thread: Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- Next by thread: Re: Are Organic Foods Really Better for You?
- Index(es):