Re: A Faulty Medical Model: The Germ Theory

In article <43d469ac$0$3546$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Carole <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>A Faulty Medical Model: The Germ Theory
>
>http://www.unhinderedliving.com/germtheory.html

Unhindered, all right -- unhindered by any recent facts, that is.

>Throughout their lives, Pasteur and Beauchamp continued to experiment
>with microorganisms. Pasteur continued to adhere to the idea of
>Monomorphism, the belief that all microbes and bacteria have only one
>form. Beauchamp was able to prove, however, the existence of
>Pleomorphism, that microbes can alter their form to appear as
>different germs. This discovery was confirmed by many scientists
>that came after Beauchamp, including Gunther Enderlein.

Utter nonsense, of course. These days, we can look at the DNA of
various microorganisms (those that have DNA, at least) and show that
these different-looking bacteria also have different DNA.

>In his experiments, Enderlein found that every living cell contains two
>distinct kinds of microorganisms called endobionts (which means "inside
>life"). These microorganisms live inside the cell and cannot be removed
>from it. They play an important role in cellular health. The state of a
>person's health is determined by the stage of development of these
>organisms. Enderlein found that all microbes that live permanently in our
>bodies go through three stages:
>
>The Primitive Stage (microbe)
>The Middle Stage (bacteria)
>The End Stage (fungus)

More nonsense. The DNA's different, and what the heck is a "microbe"
supposed to be? That's not a distinct type of anything, it's just a
generic term, usually a synonym for "bacterium."

>Other scientists were later able to confirm that there was a fourth stage
>which occurs only after extreme toxicity in which the fungus goes through a
>transformation, mutating into the Virus.

That's even dumber. Nothing "mutates into a virus." A virus isn't
even really alive, and some of them don't even contain any DNA.

>At the end of his life, Pasteur admitted that his theory was a fraud. He
>said that it was not the germs that mattered, but the medium in which they
>lived.

No, he didn't. That claim is a latter-day invention by people who
just can't seem to handle the idea of the germ theory.

>The Germ theory CANNOT account for the fact that if you expose 100
>people to what he called "pathogenic bacteria" that 10 of the people
>in that room will NOT DEVELOP THE DISEASE. It's not that germs cause
>disease at all. The pH of those people's bodies' was not acidic
>enough to support the transformation of the germ into a bacteria,
>fungus or virus. Because the germ never mutates, the person never
>gets sick.

The germ theory can handle such things just fine. Some people have an
immune system that can cope with the invading pathogen, some don't.

>Because of what I know about Louis Pasteur and The Germ Theory, there
>is no way that I will allow myself to be treated by a medical doctor
>trained in the United States or other Western countries. Their
>diagnoses and treatments inevitably make the patient sicker by
>plunging the body into an even more acidic state, and encouraging the
>more rapid transformation of microbes into deadly pathogens.

Gee, I guess I'm just imagining all those times when I took
antibiotics when I was sick and then got better.

>In fact, if a person learns to alter their diet so that it encourages
>a more alkaline pH in the body, there is no need to ever visit a
>medical practitioner of any kind.

Hope you don't break your leg.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
-- Alice Roosevelt Longworth
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: PASTEURIAN GERM THEORY vs BECHAMP CELLULAR THEORY
    ... GERM THEORY (PASTEUR) ... to impune Bechamp since they cannot refute his data and research. ... Bechamp was a PhD chemist and an MD. ... Pasteur was a con artist and a plagurist. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: "Pasteur recanted" source
    ... of the biographer nor the title of the biography. ... But that doesn't show up in "The Life of Pasteur" by Vallery-Radot ... Pasteur's germ theory of disease was false. ... research continues to hide the truth does not make the truth any less ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: giving things too much significance?
    ... deserve as much significance as they can bear. ... Pasteur came up with the germ theory of disease, ... It's very rare for a single discovery to change long-held views all by ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: "Pasteur recanted" source
    ... of the biographer nor the title of the biography. ... But that doesn't show up in "The Life of Pasteur" by Vallery-Radot ... Pasteur's germ theory of disease was false. ... and peer review flawed, and if science were being done right they ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: HOW DISEASES ARE CURED - Orthopathy
    ... The most difficult thing to understand about dis-ease and Orthopathy ... is the positon on the germ theory of disease and contagion. ... It is very easy to accept the theory that there are bacteria and then ... It is easy then to question our belief in the germ theory of disease. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)