Re: "Soil theory" obviously a censored topic in google - finally after 62 posts ONE shows up in web-based mha

In article <43cdbb42$0$23544$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Carole <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"David Wright" <wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:Miizf.603$ur7.117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> In article <43cd96a2$0$23539$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Carole <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >"David Wright" <wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >news:nV_yf.824$NS6.541@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> In article
><43cb32a1$0$23584$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> >> Carole <hubbca2003@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >What is the explanation for over 50 "soil theory" posts (this thread
>for
>> >> >starters) not showing up on web-based google then?
>> >>
>> >> The most plausible explanation is that you have screwed up. The
>> >> postings exist. We can find them when searching via google.
>> >
>> >Yes, the posts exist and I can view them in Outlook Express.
>> >HOWEVER, your last post was the 62nd post in the thread and the FIRST to
>> >show up in the mha web-based list.
>>
>> How tragic. But I use a real newsreader, and I've seen all the
>> postings.
>>
>> >You can go to
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative?start=30 and check
>> >back through the dates, right back to January 9 and NOT ONE post in the
>> >thread shows up before this last one.
>>
>> Try going back to January 8, genius. I just did and I found the whole
>> thread. The first posting, by you, is on January 8.
>
>It shows up in Outlook Express here ( Australia ) as being made on January
>9. I never thought to go back to January 8.
>
>However, the 62nd post has now DISAPPEARED from the main list again, after
>having appeared briefly today.

Oh, right, that's a brand-new conspiracy, at least until someone else
finds it. I'm not going to bother.

>> >> >The reason "they" would bother is because they want to stamp out
>> >> >alternative medicine and any viable alternatives to pharmaceuticals.
>> >>
>> >> Then "they" are doing a piss-poor job, since the alt med field is
>> >> growing by leaps and bounds.
>> >
>> >Yes, but I think my posts are censored because I am into the SOIL THEORY
>as
>> >opposed to the GERM THEORY which the pharmaceutical business with disease
>> >promotes.
>>
>> Carole, you have a vastly inflated idea of your own importance if you
>> really think anyone would bother to try to suppress your postings.
>
>That's a silly thing to say. Why do you think newspapers are so tightly
>edited to keep out dissenting views?

I see dissenting views in the paper, especially the letters to the
editor, all the time. You don't?

In any event, as I said, you're far too insignificant for anyone to
bother censoring you. Your own vast self-importance, as reflected in
your postings, is guaranteed to keep most people from giving you any
heed.

>> You're hardly the only person to post about the almighty soil theory.
>> Those postings show up too.
>
>BUT only when a person does a search, not in the normal web-based list that
>appears when you first go to mha.

No, it was in there with all the others. Listed as Jan 8, probably
because of the international date line. Google is in California.

>> Would you like to also post that fabricated Pasteur quotation where he
>> supposedly said on his deathbed that Bechamp was right? (The story is
>> a lie, in case you hadn't heard.)
>
>How do you know it was a lie?

Because the person who supplied the quotation wasn't there; the
biography by a family member who *was* there says nothing about it.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
-- Alice Roosevelt Longworth
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Soil theory" obviously a censored topic in google - finally after 62 posts ONE shows up in
    ... > It shows up in Outlook Express here as being made on January ... but I think my posts are censored because I am into the SOIL THEORY ... >> Carole, you have a vastly inflated idea of your own importance if you ... >> really think anyone would bother to try to suppress your postings. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Am I In Trouble
    ... I am one of the few regulars on this newsgoup who will even bother to read and respond to your postings. ... insects are drawn to the republican party, ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Chávez-Castro show cost USD 138 million/hour
    ... [snip portions of PL postings recently debunked here, or too lame to bother ... you pointedly refuse to admit the obvious. ... Wants Cuba 'Liberation,'" where our Mr. Lobbyist runs through almost his ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Re: duel core
    ... Steve N. wrote: ... If there are postings filled up with typos in local groups, ... >> not really double-check my postings in most cases prior to sending. ... >> I do not bother having fun with typos but I'm not in the position to ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • 440 Error - web access to outlook/Exchange
    ... I have reviewed all the postings I could find and cannot resolve my issue. ... When I go to the exchange folder for my domain /exchange, ... We can attach to Exchange from outlook. ... nic network address. ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz)