Re: Evidence of Harm

JanD wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Q2zpf.1405$DM5.534@xxxxxxxxxxx
name calling snipped

Jan, once again, snips to change meaning and not deal with the points I made. What she does not realize is the Thunderbird makes finding her snippings easy.

"Mark Probert

lies & sad attempt to ague snipped 

Jan, I resent that. I do not ague.

JanD wrote:


"Mark Probert" <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote



JanD wrote:



We who know better 


Mark Probert can NOT post without LYING and calling names.

The FACT is I did NOT change the subject. 

Again, you snipped without noting it...

Sure you did. I posted under "No Evidence of Harm" and you changed it to "Evidence of Harm".

You are so obsessed with calling me a liar, I am worried about you. Perhaps you should look into:

http://www.bhhs.org/health/hs_psych.php4

"Bloomington Hospital Psychiatric & Counseling Services accepts all forms of private insurance, Medicare and Medicaid.

The subject is the CDC, thimerosal in vaccines and autism. 

You did it again....snipping without noting...

The subject is that Kirby is full of *** and there is no evidence of harm.

http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/vaccine_policy.htm 

Actually the site tells the *truth*

What's more, chicken Mark Probert refused to answer questions about the vested interest of the CDC and FDA.

And, you did it again....I would answer them if you could actually prove what the CDC and FDA say is wrong. Boyd Haley, SafeNOMinds, etc. are not proof.

You NEVER did answer. 

And again!

Correct. Like I said, which you snipped, I would amswer if you could prove them wrong.

"Mark Probert" <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4X_of.452$DM5.414@xxxxxxxxxxx




"We at CDC are in the process of reviewing Mr. Kirby’s book in detail, but the general issues raised in the book have already been extensively examined, including by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), in the past few years. As the IOM concluded in a recent report, the vast majority of studies, which have involved hundreds of thousands of children in a number of countries, have failed to find any association between exposure to thimerosal in vaccines and autism; that is, they have failed to find any evidence of harm. (April 1, 2005)"

http://www.cdc.gov/nip/vacsafe/concerns/thimerosal/default.htm#vsdstudy 



.