Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- From: "JanD" <JanD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:19:14 GMT
"Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
http://www.hamsterdance.com/classorig.html
>
> "JanD" <JanD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:JtSif.367673$084.95670@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Happy Dog" <happydog@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:sDQif.1586$Et5.127212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <dalyjason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:1133232077.118804.232210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> This is the first time I have posted here. I was looking for
>>>> assistance. I was not looking to be insulted.
>>>
>>> In what way have you been insulted?
>>
>> Professional pick pockets distract the mark in various ways. Cranial
>> manipulation must be a new one.
>>
>> You got the best advice you could pay for in usenet.
>>
>> The fact is that the claim that the bones that comprise the skull can be
>> manipulated is utterly absurd.
>>
>> Further, the idea that this can address AD/HD is even more absurd.
>>
>> So, do you want advice or warm fuzzy support for something you really
>> want
>> to be true? The truth is that once the sutures fuse, (and a baby's
>> fontanelles or 'soft spots' close) the cranium is one solid sturdy box,
>> and
>> even the strongest chiropractor's thumbs are not going to be moving the
>> bones around. Only the mandible, the hyoid, and, to some extent the nasal
>> septum are mobile. Moving those is not going to help autism or ADD, nor
>> would moving any of the bones comprising the cranial vault. "Cranial
>> Adjustment" is a fraud, designed to extract money from the naive.
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is a link that you may find interesting.
>>>> http://www.turnerwellness.com/media/cranial-adjusting-mike.pdf
>>>
>>> It isn't. It's a hodgepodge of long-discredited
>>
>> Discredited by whom?
>>
>> ancient ideas that have
>>> been resurrected to make a worthless "treatment" seem useful.
>>
>> WRONG.
>>
>>
>> Ask yourself
>>> this: If the claims are true, why isn't there any decent
>>
>> ZZzz.
>>
>> *Substantial* *real* *solid* *convincing* *hard* *clear-cut* *reasonable*
>> *significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* *direct* *unreliable*
>> *decent*
>>
>>
>> research that
>>> confirms them? Why isn't there any theory that predicts them to be
>>> likely or possible?
>>>
>>> moo
>>
>> http://www.chiropractors.asn.au/cjournal/vol35/cjamarch05.html
>
> "Discredited by whom?
> WRONG.
> ZZzz."
> --
>
>
> --Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- References:
- Cranial Adjustment?
- From: dalyjason
- Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- From: dalyjason
- Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- From: Rich
- Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- From: dalyjason
- Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- From: Happy Dog
- Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- From: JanD
- Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- From: Rich
- Cranial Adjustment?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- Next by Date: Re: Eye Exercises
- Previous by thread: Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- Next by thread: Re: Cranial Adjustment?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|