Re: Reasonable Posts For the Reading Pleasure of Richard H Jacobson


"JanD" <JanD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8asif.577131$x96.104723@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Note: I guess he doesn't think his are *reasonable* as:
>
> HE HAS NUKED THEM.
>
> To use his favorite words *the proof is in the pudding*-)))))))))
>
> From: JDrew63929 (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)Subject:
> Re: Andrew? was Re: Migraines & Magnets Newsgroups:
> misc.health.alternative
> Date: 2000/06/21 .
>
> Yes I admit I am too quick to react. I respect John's for ability to
> remain
> a gentleman and say what needs to be said. This NG has become a trashing
> contest, rather than an alternative NG. I hope this will change
>
>
> Thanks for your sincere reply.
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> From: Jan (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)Subject: Re: Re Why are people turning to
> alt.
> medicine? Newsgroups: misc.health.alternativeDate: 2002-03-03 09:20:35 PST
>
>
> Yes I said that and it was wrong
>
>
> From: JDrew63929 (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)
>
>
> Subject: Re: ? for rich andrews, was: re some religious laws or something
> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative Date: 2001-07-12 19:03:30 PST
>
>
> I stand corrected. Rich did not ask me to post them.
>
>
> From: JDrew63929 (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)
>
>
> Subject: Re: Is she a doctor? Newsgroups: misc.health.alternativeDate:
> 1999/06/15
>
>
> Yes, you are quite correct. I stand corrected. I do believe this is in a
> different context than Happy Dog was referring to.
>
>
> From: JDrew63929 (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)Subject: Re: Interesting Info from
> Dr.
> Barrett Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative Date: 2001-07-05 00:45:34
> PST
>
>
> I do wish to apologize, I should have stated that it was the first post
> that I have read from you. Not your very first post. My mistake. Sorry, I
> caused you all that trouble. I suspect you have already figured this out,
> before you read this. And I do apologize for saying that. That wasn't
> fair.:
>
>
> (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)Subject: Re: Take a hike Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
> Date: 2001-09-14 15:47:45 PST
>
>
> Yes, you are correct and I apologize for losing my temper.
>
> Jan
>
> http://tinyurl.com/exowv
>
> Nov 15 1999,
>
> Well I did agree with some of the posts that he posted from other MD's and
> the
> like, but was quite taken back by his post about someone's mother!!
> Gheez!! I
> had been gone and was speed reading to get caught up. It wasn't even full
> moon!
> Ya just never know what will come next here on this NG. AF has tried to
> trash
> my daughter several times, but I just let it roll off as much as possible.
> Wonder why we can't just discuss health without all the interest in
> degrees and
> such?? Some of the bestest and smartest prople didn't have all that great
> book
> learnin, if ya no wat I mean. And raisin them ther youngins sur tens to
> give 1
> a lot of no how. Trashin one's mom it just bout as low as it gits. I
> reckon
> that bout says it all. Now don't go and git caught while peekin in, ya
> hear.
>
>
> Jan
>
> (in reply to David Wright)
>
> Jul 13 1999
>
>
> We weren't talking about apples. That is a different subject. I was
> speaking of
> the 78th chapter of Psalms.
>
>
> To answer your question about Cain and Abel's offerings. Abel's was the
> firstlings of his flock. Cain's was the fruit of the ground. Man had been
> instructed that offerings were to be of blood, as the blood Jesus atones
> for
> sins. It had nothing to do with meat and fruit.
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> Should is not good enough. There are some things it will not wash off,
> plus
> detergent has some things in it that are not good and very hard to rinse
> off.
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> PS. Good to see that we partially agree about something. Wonder how long
> it
> will last?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: kala...@xxxxxxxxxx (Rich)
>>Date: Tue, 13 July 1999 03:12 AM EDT
>
>
>
> *******MY MY THIS POST HAS BEEN NUKED*************
>
>
>
>
>>On 13 Jul 1999 05:29:08 GMT, jdrew63...@xxxxxxx (JDrew63929) wrote:
>
>>>I really don't know what your problem is.
>
>
>>None that I know of.
>
>
>
> That is the worse kind, you are in denial. Perhaps someone could help you
> with
> that?
>
> But you sure seem to have your share of problems.
>
>
> No, I think I have had more than my share. However I haven't given up as
> many
> people who just accept it as a way of life. I am doing something about, I
> guess
> that bothers you? And what happened to all your concern that this NG was
> so
> stressful to me? Are you contributing to that stress?
>
>
>
>> You take great delight in your claims
>>>of my being psychosomatic. So be it. I can do without it.
>
>>Yes, I imagine that I am not the first or the last who has suggested
>>that you have psychosomatic problems.
>
>
>
> Yes, it fits with all who believe that if you don't fit the recepie book,
> you
> are labeled. That is easier than finding a cause. It is a old stand by
> used by
> conventional medicene.
>
>
>>>Now, I will move on to get the mercury out of my body. It will take a
>>>long
>>>time.
>
>>Yeah. Better luck next life.
>
>
>
> Your compassion overwhelms me. You really should seek help.
>
>
>>>I am pretty sick of people telling me that all my problems are in my
>>>head.
>>>Diamond Headache Clinic knew my headaches were real.
>
>>I never said that your headaches were not real. They still were ALL in
>>your head so to speak.
>
>
>> In any case I find it interesting that the only medication that
>>worked for your headaches was Nardil which is an antidepressant.
>>Nardil is NOT used to treat headaches in the absence of a depressive
>>disorder.
>
>
>
> Most people do not realize that anitdepressants are used for headaches.
> Diamond
> Headache Clinic has discovered it. All people who have had headaches over
> a
> period of time are depressed. Do you think you could have had one for 12
> years
> straight without being depressed? Depression can be caused by pain.
>
> Whoever evaluated you determined that your headaches may be
>
>
>
>>secondary to some kind of depressive disorder associated with numerous
>>somatic complaints including cephalgia.
>
>
> Oh? Gosh, Rich, if only I had known you before Diamond. You could have
> dignosed
> me and saved me. I'll tell Connecticut General insurance to contact you.
> They
> could have saved $97,000.00 that they spent on me. Then, I will contact
> Diamond
> and see if you can be on the list of doctors there. I certainly was tested
> to
> see if I was psychosomatic. I guess that you do not realize that Nardil is
> a
> very powerful drug. It would be easy to kill yourself (by taking other
> drugs or
> alcohol) with very little problem. The patient is evaluated and revaluated
> before given Nardil. Guess you are not quite as smart as you think?
>
>
>>>My EMG tests show I have peripheral neuropathy. Have any idea what that
>>>is,
>>>Rich?
>
>>Yep.
>
>
>
> OK, describe the pain.
>
>
>> There are many people who have mercury poisoning. It is not a fairy
>>>tale. I am on a metals list, everyone there has mercury poisoning. There
>>>is
>>a chemist there who has it. He has worked in the lab proving all the
>>effects
>>of >it. He has written a book.
>
>>>You are free to believe whatever you please.
>
>
>>As are you. It obviously helps you to believe that you have a
>>condition for which you believe that you are receiving the effective
>>treatment to combat it.
>
>
>
> Naaw, I don't really believe that, I was just bored and thought I would
> try
> getting some new fillings. It is loads of fun, and I have load of money. I
> noticed you didn't mention what the dentist found yesterday. strange, I
> was
> sure you would have a diagnoses for that also.
>
>
>>>Now, get off my case!
>
>>Now Jan. You seem a bit irritable today. Don't I have the right to
>>express my opinion here?? Or are you going to start calling me a
>>commie pinko atheistic debunker???
>
>
>>Sweet dreams.
>
>
>>Aloha,
>
>
>>Rich
>
>
>
> How could anyone be irritable with such a wonderful, concerned guy such as
> yourself? The sweetness shows so much in all your posts to me.
>
> Keep smi......inn
>
>
> Jan
>
>


Yes, you have made some apologies in a few posts in which you were almost
pleasant. Those are NOT discussions. A discussion involves back and forth,
comment and reply, assertion and rebuttal, all the while minding ones
manners and retaining respect for the other parties in the discussion. THAT
is what you have never done in this newsgroup and what you are incapable of.
I see in the above threads that before a discussion gets beyond the second
exchange, you get sarcastic or worse. At least back in those good old days
you had not yet entered your complusive "liar, liar" phase. You weren't
doing "ZZzz" or "[snip]" yet either. My how your manners have degenerated.
you've changed into a mean old woman.
--


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/


.

Quantcast