Re: Reasonable Posts For the Reading Pleasure of Richard H Jacobson


"Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Arsif.47518$Hs.39607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "JanD" <JanD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:8asif.577131$x96.104723@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Note: I guess he doesn't think his are *reasonable* as:
>>
>> HE HAS NUKED THEM.
>>
>> To use his favorite words *the proof is in the pudding*-)))))))))
>>
>> From: JDrew63929 (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)Subject:
>> Re: Andrew? was Re: Migraines & Magnets Newsgroups:
>> misc.health.alternative
>> Date: 2000/06/21 .
>>
>> Yes I admit I am too quick to react. I respect John's for ability to
>> remain
>> a gentleman and say what needs to be said. This NG has become a trashing
>> contest, rather than an alternative NG. I hope this will change
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your sincere reply.
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>> From: Jan (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)Subject: Re: Re Why are people turning to
>> alt.
>> medicine? Newsgroups: misc.health.alternativeDate: 2002-03-03 09:20:35
>> PST
>>
>>
>> Yes I said that and it was wrong
>>
>>
>> From: JDrew63929 (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: ? for rich andrews, was: re some religious laws or something
>> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative Date: 2001-07-12 19:03:30 PST
>>
>>
>> I stand corrected. Rich did not ask me to post them.
>>
>>
>> From: JDrew63929 (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: Is she a doctor? Newsgroups: misc.health.alternativeDate:
>> 1999/06/15
>>
>>
>> Yes, you are quite correct. I stand corrected. I do believe this is in a
>> different context than Happy Dog was referring to.
>>
>>
>> From: JDrew63929 (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)Subject: Re: Interesting Info from
>> Dr.
>> Barrett Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative Date: 2001-07-05 00:45:34
>> PST
>>
>>
>> I do wish to apologize, I should have stated that it was the first
>> post
>> that I have read from you. Not your very first post. My mistake. Sorry, I
>> caused you all that trouble. I suspect you have already figured this out,
>> before you read this. And I do apologize for saying that. That wasn't
>> fair.:
>>
>>
>> (jdrew63...@xxxxxxx)Subject: Re: Take a hike Newsgroups:
>> sci.med.dentistry
>> Date: 2001-09-14 15:47:45 PST
>>
>>
>> Yes, you are correct and I apologize for losing my temper.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/exowv
>>
>> Nov 15 1999,
>>
>> Well I did agree with some of the posts that he posted from other MD's
>> and the
>> like, but was quite taken back by his post about someone's mother!!
>> Gheez!! I
>> had been gone and was speed reading to get caught up. It wasn't even full
>> moon!
>> Ya just never know what will come next here on this NG. AF has tried to
>> trash
>> my daughter several times, but I just let it roll off as much as
>> possible.
>> Wonder why we can't just discuss health without all the interest in
>> degrees and
>> such?? Some of the bestest and smartest prople didn't have all that great
>> book
>> learnin, if ya no wat I mean. And raisin them ther youngins sur tens to
>> give 1
>> a lot of no how. Trashin one's mom it just bout as low as it gits. I
>> reckon
>> that bout says it all. Now don't go and git caught while peekin in, ya
>> hear.
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> (in reply to David Wright)
>>
>> Jul 13 1999
>>
>>
>> We weren't talking about apples. That is a different subject. I was
>> speaking of
>> the 78th chapter of Psalms.
>>
>>
>> To answer your question about Cain and Abel's offerings. Abel's was the
>> firstlings of his flock. Cain's was the fruit of the ground. Man had been
>> instructed that offerings were to be of blood, as the blood Jesus atones
>> for
>> sins. It had nothing to do with meat and fruit.
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>> Should is not good enough. There are some things it will not wash off,
>> plus
>> detergent has some things in it that are not good and very hard to rinse
>> off.
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>> PS. Good to see that we partially agree about something. Wonder how long
>> it
>> will last?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: kala...@xxxxxxxxxx (Rich)
>>>Date: Tue, 13 July 1999 03:12 AM EDT
>>
>>
>>
>> *******MY MY THIS POST HAS BEEN NUKED*************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On 13 Jul 1999 05:29:08 GMT, jdrew63...@xxxxxxx (JDrew63929) wrote:
>>
>>>>I really don't know what your problem is.
>>
>>
>>>None that I know of.
>>
>>
>>
>> That is the worse kind, you are in denial. Perhaps someone could help you
>> with
>> that?
>>
>> But you sure seem to have your share of problems.
>>
>>
>> No, I think I have had more than my share. However I haven't given up as
>> many
>> people who just accept it as a way of life. I am doing something about, I
>> guess
>> that bothers you? And what happened to all your concern that this NG was
>> so
>> stressful to me? Are you contributing to that stress?
>>
>>
>>
>>> You take great delight in your claims
>>>>of my being psychosomatic. So be it. I can do without it.
>>
>>>Yes, I imagine that I am not the first or the last who has suggested
>>>that you have psychosomatic problems.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, it fits with all who believe that if you don't fit the recepie book,
>> you
>> are labeled. That is easier than finding a cause. It is a old stand by
>> used by
>> conventional medicene.
>>
>>
>>>>Now, I will move on to get the mercury out of my body. It will take a
>>>>long
>>>>time.
>>
>>>Yeah. Better luck next life.
>>
>>
>>
>> Your compassion overwhelms me. You really should seek help.
>>
>>
>>>>I am pretty sick of people telling me that all my problems are in my
>>>>head.
>>>>Diamond Headache Clinic knew my headaches were real.
>>
>>>I never said that your headaches were not real. They still were ALL in
>>>your head so to speak.
>>
>>
>>> In any case I find it interesting that the only medication that
>>>worked for your headaches was Nardil which is an antidepressant.
>>>Nardil is NOT used to treat headaches in the absence of a depressive
>>>disorder.
>>
>>
>>
>> Most people do not realize that anitdepressants are used for headaches.
>> Diamond
>> Headache Clinic has discovered it. All people who have had headaches over
>> a
>> period of time are depressed. Do you think you could have had one for 12
>> years
>> straight without being depressed? Depression can be caused by pain.
>>
>> Whoever evaluated you determined that your headaches may be
>>
>>
>>
>>>secondary to some kind of depressive disorder associated with numerous
>>>somatic complaints including cephalgia.
>>
>>
>> Oh? Gosh, Rich, if only I had known you before Diamond. You could have
>> dignosed
>> me and saved me. I'll tell Connecticut General insurance to contact you.
>> They
>> could have saved $97,000.00 that they spent on me. Then, I will contact
>> Diamond
>> and see if you can be on the list of doctors there. I certainly was
>> tested to
>> see if I was psychosomatic. I guess that you do not realize that Nardil
>> is a
>> very powerful drug. It would be easy to kill yourself (by taking other
>> drugs or
>> alcohol) with very little problem. The patient is evaluated and
>> revaluated
>> before given Nardil. Guess you are not quite as smart as you think?
>>
>>
>>>>My EMG tests show I have peripheral neuropathy. Have any idea what that
>>>>is,
>>>>Rich?
>>
>>>Yep.
>>
>>
>>
>> OK, describe the pain.
>>
>>
>>> There are many people who have mercury poisoning. It is not a fairy
>>>>tale. I am on a metals list, everyone there has mercury poisoning. There
>>>>is
>>>a chemist there who has it. He has worked in the lab proving all the
>>>effects
>>>of >it. He has written a book.
>>
>>>>You are free to believe whatever you please.
>>
>>
>>>As are you. It obviously helps you to believe that you have a
>>>condition for which you believe that you are receiving the effective
>>>treatment to combat it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Naaw, I don't really believe that, I was just bored and thought I would
>> try
>> getting some new fillings. It is loads of fun, and I have load of money.
>> I
>> noticed you didn't mention what the dentist found yesterday. strange, I
>> was
>> sure you would have a diagnoses for that also.
>>
>>
>>>>Now, get off my case!
>>
>>>Now Jan. You seem a bit irritable today. Don't I have the right to
>>>express my opinion here?? Or are you going to start calling me a
>>>commie pinko atheistic debunker???
>>
>>
>>>Sweet dreams.
>>
>>
>>>Aloha,
>>
>>
>>>Rich
>>
>>
>>
>> How could anyone be irritable with such a wonderful, concerned guy such
>> as
>> yourself? The sweetness shows so much in all your posts to me.
>>
>> Keep smi......inn
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>
>
> Yes, you have made some apologies in a few posts in which you were almost
> pleasant. Those are NOT discussions. A discussion involves back and forth,
> comment and reply, assertion and rebuttal, all the while minding ones
> manners and retaining respect for the other parties in the discussion.
> THAT is what you have never done in this newsgroup

I posted A DISCUSSION, one where Richard H Jacobson NUKED his posts.

YOU overlooked that, didn't you, Rich?

There are PLENTY of REASONABLE discussions by me in this newsgroup.

I did that BEFORE *YOU* were ever on this newsgroup!

Furthermore, I did NOT post them for YOU.

[lies + usual insults snipped]
>
>
> --Rich

>
>


.

Quantcast