Re: The TRUTH About Amalgams


"Sdores" <sdores@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%Ehhf.24972$6y4.3032@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yes I have seen the new info. I just don't think posting and reposting
> cut and paste does anything. You never listen to the other side of the
> controversy.

Oh knock if off, I have listened for years.


I have been poisoned by chemicals and I know what it does.
> Why don't you have lung damage? I do, I have scarring too and need help
> with my breathing when I get in trouble. What should I do, chelating?

Nobody mentioned chelating, you are getting carried away as usual.I have
already expressed my opinion and sympathy for your being poisoned by
chemicals, YOU have shown NONE in return.

No I
> don't think so not with what I have read about this AND I spoke to my
> pulmonary and GI dr who also said that this route give me a chance to do
> more damage then I already have. You are the one always looking for a
> fight.

Not even.

YOU were looking for one, as a matter of fact YOU were still in the protect
Joel Eichen mode, I just didn't bother to post his baltherings in between
the posts I posted, when I posted his 20,000 LIES using my name, your next
post said PLONK.

The fact is you can in late and saw the title of this tread and have no idea
what it was posted.

I just made a comment which you took personal.

Wrong, you made the same comment and it was WRONG just like it was WRONG
previously.



Get over yourself.
> UM MOM Susan

Take you own advice.
JJ MOM Jan

See if you can't email someone so you can gossip about Jan.

>
> "JanD" <JanD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:vu8hf.596084$xm3.159538@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Sdores" <sdores@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:4m5hf.16534$s92.14277@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> All I can say is my family have never had a problem with amalgams and if
>>> anyone should it would be my brother who is healthy as an ox and older
>>> than me. My son has some too, not many but enough and he hasn't had any
>>> problems either other than having to replace a few that he got when he
>>> was younger that got new decay. I worry more about mercury in fish
>>> which is something I really enjoy. Just my opinion UM MOM Susan
>>>
>>
>> Yes, you said that before.
>>
>> You seem rather in the mood to argue today, Susan.
>>
>> I read this before from you and I told you I don't have any mercury
>> fillings, I barely have any teeth now due to my crohn's and bleeding in
>> 2000
>> and surgeries. And shell fish have more of a danger to people, esp.
>> children and pregnant woman than does fillings. You like to post the
>> same
>> things but don't hear what others say to you. What a shame! UM MOM
>> Susan
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>> http://www.health.gov/environment/amalgam2/National.html
>>
>>
>> http://www.altcorp.com/dentalinformation/worldwidehg.htm
>>
>>
>> From the Sho
>>
>>
>> Source Average Human Daily Dose of
>> MercuryDental Amalgam 3.0 - 17.0
>> ug/day
>> (hgvapor)
>>
>>
>> Fish and Seafood 2.3 ug/day
>> (methylmercury)Other Food
>> 0.3
>> ug/day (inorganichg)Air &Water
>> Negligible traces(World Health Organization, Environmental Health
>> Criteria 118:
>> InorganicMercury, Geneva, 1991.)
>>
>>
>> Look at the dates!!! New info was just released this year, 2004!
>>
>> Do post it.
>>
>>
>> This is your gig, find it for yourself. I have other things to deal
>> with
>> and mercury isn't my problem. You seem to like to research,so look it
>> up.
>> It was on MSNBC or CNN I believe which means you should be able to find
>> the
>> info at www.fda.org I would think since we are talking foods
>>
>> Wrong, YOU made the claim, YOU prove it.
>>
>>
>>
>>>I have other things to deal with and mercury isn't my problem. You seem
>>>to like to research,so look it up. It was on MSNBC or CNN I believe which
>>>means you should be able to find the info at www.fda.org I would think
>>>since we are talking foods
>>
>>
>> I am well aware of the fish warnings.
>>
>>
>> My point was:
>>
>>
>> Mercury from amalgams is the number one source of mercury in people.
>>
>>
>> You also stated:
>>
>>
>> And shell fish have more of a danger to people, esp. children and
>> pregnant
>> woman than does fillings.
>>
>>
>> That is incorrect.
>>
>>
>> gave you the link so chill out! You're the one posting old stuff about
>> mercury in the teeth. I also believe this is not healthy, but I don't
>> want
>> to get into this with you because no matter what I say, you are right and
>> I
>> am wrong. I am done with this.
>>
>> You sound angry.
>>
>>
>>
>>> You're the one posting old stuff about mercury in the teeth.
>>
>>
>> The word *old* is an excuse.
>>
>>
>> I am posting studies of the dangers of mercury amalgams.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I also believe this is not healthy, but I don't want to get into this
>>> with
>>
>>
>> you
>>
>>
>> Fine.
>>
>>
>> You first post was insulting.
>>
>>
>> I'm not interested in that.
>>
>>
>> I am intested in all those who are STILL searching for their *unanswered*
>> health problem, and STILL suffering not thinking to check the teeth.
>>
>>
>> *I* was one of them, I nearly died, now I have helped others and will
>> continue.
>>
>>
>> I also will correct statments that are incorrect.
>>
>>
>> <more insults snipped>
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>
>>> "JanD" <JanD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:eCMgf.351736$084.268142@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> A Repost
>>>>
>>>> Mercury-amalgam dental fillings have never been subjected to the kind
>>>> of
>>>> regulatory scrutiny and approval process demanded of all modern drugs
>>>> and
>>>> medical devices to prove safety.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Until this day dentistry has used marketing, political influence, and
>>>> control
>>>> of regulatory boards at all levels to impose its self-serving economic
>>>> view
>>>> that mercury-amalgam is completely safe. The science that proves safety
>>>> is
>>>> still not forthcoming from the ADA, nor from dental schools, nor from
>>>> mercury-amalgam manufacturers.
>>>> Science has not been the driving force behind the ADA's public
>>>> information on
>>>> mercury release. When asked about the safety of mercury amalgam the
>>>> response
>>>> one always heard previously, and can still hear today in many dental
>>>> offices
>>>> is: "once set, the mercury becomes completely stable and locked up, it
>>>> doesn't
>>>> leak out". After it was unequivocally demonstrated that mercury vapor
>>>> continuously escapes from mercury-amalgam fillings the ADA repositioned
>>>> itself
>>>> and now claims: "the small amount of mercury released from amalgam
>>>> restorations, especially during placement and removal, has not been
>>>> shown to
>>>> cause any adverse health effects."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mercury escapes from amalgam and is taken up by the human as metallic
>>>> vapor,
>>>> metallic vapor and ionic mercury dissolved in saliva, and as unknown
>>>> mercury
>>>> species directly through the tooth pulp and root into the
>>>> bloodstream.[3] Ionic
>>>> mercury in saliva is converted to methylmercury.[4]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mercury travels from amalgam fillings into the jaw, gut, liver,
>>>> kidneys, glands
>>>> and brain, crosses the placenta to the fetus, and is found in mother's
>>>> milk.[18] [19] [20] [21] [22]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WARNING TO PARENTS:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "SILVER" FILLINGS ARE REALLY 50% MERCURY!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION SAYS THEY ARE SAFE!
>>>> CONCERNED PARENTS SHOULD KNOW:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> MERCURY has been eliminated from all other uses in the human body,
>>>> including
>>>> vaccines, disinfectants, and other oral uses.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All other health care associations support full disclosure, while the
>>>> American
>>>> Dental Association hides its use of MERCURY.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The ADA receives money from MERCURY amalgam manufacturers through its
>>>> Seal of
>>>> Acceptance program, in contrast with the American Medical Association,
>>>> which
>>>> rejected taking fees for product endorsements.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The ADA holds patents on amalgam (since expired), furthering its
>>>> business
>>>> interests by the continued use of MERCURY in dentistry.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The ADA endorses pre-Civil War medicine, saying amalgam is justified
>>>> because
>>>> its use began in 1850!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The ADA says MERCURY dental fillings are safe to use in children's
>>>> teeth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In 1997, MERCURY amalgam filling manufacturer Dentsply stated that
>>>> MERCURY
>>>> amalgam fillings are "contraindicated" (meaning DO NOT USE) for
>>>> children and
>>>> pregnant women.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The American Dental Association is still calling MERCURY amalgam
>>>> fillings
>>>> "silver" and denies MERCURY fillings can ever be dangerous!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Federal and most state medical insurance programs only pay for MERCURY
>>>> fillings
>>>> because they are the least expensive, so poor people and poor children
>>>> are
>>>> especially at risk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> U.S. Public Health Service: The largest component of amalgam is
>>>> MERCURY.
>>>> ADA: Amalgam is "silver" fillings.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> U.S. Public Health Service: For most people, the leading cause of
>>>> MERCURY
>>>> toxicity is amalgam fillings, not fish.
>>>> ADA: You only get traces of MERCURY vapor in your body.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> U S Public Health Service: MERCURY is a dangerous neuro-toxin; the
>>>> MERCURY in
>>>> amalgam goes to the brain, and to a fetus through the placenta.
>>>> ADA: MERCURY exposure is like having an "allergy" to dust or pollen!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> American Medical Association: Don't take $$$ for endorsements.
>>>> ADA: Receives fees from MERCURY amalgam manufacturers while calling
>>>> amalgam
>>>> "safe". For further information on this issue and links to recent press
>>>> coverage of the controversy with the ADA and the dangers of Mercury in
>>>> dentistry, please read the August 22 Page 1 article in the Chicago
>>>> Tribune:
>>>> http://chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0108220248aug22.story?coll=c...
>>>> news%2Dhed
>>>> and visit: www.toxicteeth.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dentists being bad
    ... mercury in the teeth. ... I also believe this is not healthy, ... >>and mercury isn't my problem. ... > I am well aware of the fish warnings. ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Are Amalgams Slowly Poisoning You??
    ... Dental Amalgams the "silver" fillings in your teeth Is It Safe? ... Dental amalgam, the material in “silver” tooth fillings, contains ... approximately 50 per cent of the highly toxic heavy metal mercury. ... Welcome to...Is Mercury Amalgam Fillings slowly poisoning us? ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Are Amalgams Slowly Poisoning You??
    ... Dental Amalgams the "silver" fillings in your teeth Is It Safe? ... Dental amalgam, the material in “silver” tooth fillings, contains ... approximately 50 per cent of the highly toxic heavy metal mercury. ... Welcome to...Is Mercury Amalgam Fillings slowly poisoning us? ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Are Amalgams Slowly Poisoning You??
    ... Dental Amalgams the "silver" fillings in your teeth Is It Safe? ... Dental amalgam, the material in “silver” tooth fillings, contains ... approximately 50 per cent of the highly toxic heavy metal mercury. ... Welcome to...Is Mercury Amalgam Fillings slowly poisoning us? ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Never-Ending Obsession
    ... an obsession of animosity between Jan and her ... Did one of the dentists used to be Jan's dentist? ... Broken or not, some mercury comes out. ... >ruining people's teeth from the time that society began eating more ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)