Re: Rich Shewmaker LIES & Defends A BLANTANT *GANG* LIAR


"Mark Probert" <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wKb9f.30826$rE2.3537@xxxxxxxxxxx
> LadyLollipop wrote:
>> "Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:AP19f.3965$QM5.622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:zEX8f.499939$_o.256036@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>>"Mark Probert" <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>news:gNS8f.25113$ol.23209@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>>>The FACT is you did NOT read Torah ever day.
>>>>>
>>>>>You are not in my home. You have no way of knowing.
>>>>
>>>>Poor Mark
>>>>
>>>>I know because YOU do NOT even know the word yee is NOT in the old
>>>>testament.
>>>
>>>Neither "ye" nor "yee" is in the Torah. Those words are from the early
>>>17th century when the King James Version of the Bible was translated from
>>>the Hebrew and the Greek. Mark, no doubt, reads the Torah in the Hebrew.
>>>(Jewish children are required to learn to do this to complete their
>>>ceremonial passage into adulthood.) So YOUR argument falls flat. Oh, and
>>>spelling was much more flexible in King James' time, so probably either
>>>"yee" or "ye" would have been correct then. Modern editions of the KJV
>>>have been cleaned up for consistency. Now what OTHER evidence do you have
>>>that Mark doesn't read the Torah daily?
>>
>>
>
> Diversion deleted.

The was no diversion.

Restored:


EX 20:16 EX 20:16 EX 20:16 EX 20:16 EX 20:16

READ HIS POSTS.

Researcher (Sandra Cabot) and theWarns of Cancer Risk From rBGH
(non-organic) Dairy Foods

THAT'S A LIE!!!!

See my post to YOU today!

Then READ AGAIN the title of this thread and the VERY first post.

Next STOP defending a BLATANT *REPEATED* LIAR.

But YOU won't.

Because YOU are ONE also.





> --
>
>
> --Rich
>
> Recommended LYING websites: Deleted


[snip more lies]


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Rich Shewmaker LIES & Defends A BLANTANT *GANG* LIAR
    ... I know because YOU do NOT even know the word yee is NOT in the old testament. ... Mark, no doubt, reads the Torah in the Hebrew. ... Oh, and spelling was much more flexible in King James' time, so probably either "yee" or "ye" would have been correct then. ... Now what OTHER evidence do you have that Mark doesn't read the Torah daily? ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: The Number of the Beast
    ... but the meaning in the original context is specifically six hundred ... The King James Version of the Bible uses ... "Hebrew", you say? ... which was written in Greek even though the native language of most of its authors was probably Aramaic. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: what is etymology? (linguistics and biology)
    ... it was Hebrew. ... produce some evidence of such a late dating of Mark. ... Invalid comes ... a neutral word again - neutral words are charged by hate, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: what is etymology? (linguistics and biology)
    ... >> The most common theory of how the Gospels were written is that Mark was ... it was Hebrew. ... one-to-one to grammatical morphemes in other languages). ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: what is etymology? (linguistics and biology)
    ... it was Hebrew. ... produce some evidence of such a late dating of Mark. ... >> Third, it's not a translation. ... > If that quote from an article in a fairly reliable newspaper ...
    (sci.lang)