"Organized Medicine" A step Toward a Definition
- From: Mark Probert <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:28:13 -0400
LadyLollipop wrote:
> "george_of_the_bush" <not@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:fpn5m1h45mmhntiab7vdr5iu632763bod5@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:42:30 -0400, Mark Probert
>> <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> LadyLollipop wrote:
>>>
>>>> Once again Mark Probert makes a misleading title.
>>
>>
>>>> *Organized medicine*
>>>
>>>
>>> Just like Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, there is no such thing as
>>> organized medicine. If medicine were truly organized, it would prohibit
>>> the publication of studies which show that a basic tool of the
>>> profession is flawed. Obviously, since you read this article, you now
>>> know that this is not the case. I note that alties rarely critique other
>>> alties, even when their products actually conflict in underLYING
>>> philosophy.
>>
>>
>> No one in their right mind would call U.S. medicine organized. Maybe
>> Canadian medicine is.
>>
>> _g
>
>
>
> Evidently, you aren't in your right mind.
>
> Been in the bush too long.
>
> The AMA, FDA, NCI., ACS are all in the US.
So, the British Medical Society, WHO, etc. are not part of organized medicine.
> > http://curezone.com/art/read.asp?ID=91&db=5&C0=779
That is an AltFascist website where free speech is a foreign language, no matter what language you speak.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Organized Medicine" A step Toward a Definition
- From: LadyLollipop
- Re: "Organized Medicine" A step Toward a Definition
- Prev by Date: Re: Vitamin Survey
- Next by Date: Re: The Significance of the Courtroom Defeat of Steven Barrett
- Previous by thread: Re: MORE STALKING and Harassment from Jan Drew
- Next by thread: Re: "Organized Medicine" A step Toward a Definition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
