Re: A MHA Pool
- From: Mark Probert <markprobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:39:16 -0400
LadyLollipop wrote:
"Mark" <mlowry3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1128002796.560307.132220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Firstly, I'd like to apologize for the rough language, but you really annoyed me with that one, Jan.
You get annoyed rather easy, but just from *certain* posters.
Yes, you do have that effect on people.
In a response to Mark P., who wrote
about an herb with purported effects on insulin sensitivity, you replied with the following:
"While giving his child Ritalin, which does NOT show any long term studies..."
Yes, I did, and the reason is self explanatory.
No, it is not. I was discussing the good news that a supplement may be coming that actually can positively affect a person who suffers from diabetes. There was no mention of methylphenidate, my family, or ADHD.
Thus, your mentioning that, as quatoed by Mark, is NOT self explanatory. However, AFAIAC, the only explanation is that you are following in the cleanse coated footsteps of your handler and are engaging in Net Stalking.
First for what Mark wrote:
I have often mentioned that the alternative/supplement/herbal/hocus pocus
medical industry often takes a scientific finding, concocts a potion, and then rushes it to market before efficacy in humans is demonstrated. Today's news contained an article where a supplement was found to increase insulin sensitivity in non-diabetics. The question remains whether this will also happen in diabetics.
The question remains, what the long term will do to his child, but he does NOT question that!
Like I pointed out, I know what 16+ years of treatment resulted in.
What the hell does Mark's child's ADHD medication have to do with the price of tea in China?
It has nothing to do with the price of tea in China it has to do with what he said above.
Only in your sick mind.
It's off-topic, AND it drags someone's childinto the discussion. What's the point, huh?
See above.
So, you have no response.
You have evidently made spouses,
WRONG, you shouldn't believe LIES
colleagues, you shouldn't believe LIES
WRONG, you shouldn't believe LIES
co-workers
WRONG, you shouldn't believe LIES
and employers
CORRECT, I had my reasons
fair game insofar as dragging them into the fake world of mha,
You have done all of the above.
see above
but now
you want to involve other posters' children? That's low and reprehensible, even for you, Mrs. Drew.
Mark, MD
I did NOT involve other posters' children. I involved Mark's DECISIONS of giving meds to his child with NO questions!
That means you involved my son. Period. And, how the hell do you know that I had no questions? What sort of *** are you?
You certainly are *selective* Mark MD, you have seen Richard H Jacobson's despicable posts about my ill and dead parent/s for ABSOLEUTELY NO REASON, but to belittle me, in NO health discussion whatsoever, and you have said NOT one word.
That's low and reprehensible, even for you, Mark MD
Back to you bitch.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A MHA Pool
- From: LadyLollipop
- Re: A MHA Pool
- References:
- A MHA Pool
- From: Mark Probert
- Re: A MHA Pool
- From: Mark
- Re: A MHA Pool
- From: LadyLollipop
- Re: A MHA Pool
- From: Mark
- A MHA Pool
- Prev by Date: Re: Mark Probert Calls Jan Drew A Moron
- Next by Date: Re: A MHA Pool
- Previous by thread: Re: A MHA Pool
- Next by thread: Re: A MHA Pool
- Index(es):