Re: License To Kill Is A OK Within Conventional Medicine


"Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EQLQe.7139$UE2.1630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:trLQe.289650$x96.61355@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:BUzQe.7073$UE2.1309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:6JzQe.314885$xm3.70465@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> "Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:V1zQe.7062$UE2.4133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What would you propose as a better solution, Jan? Perhaps if we have
>>>>> all the doctors taken out back and shot?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --Rich
>>>>
>>>> I suggest, YOU get real, Rich!!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>> In other words, you have no idea whatsoever how to make things better.
>>> You just want to stamp your little feet about the way things are.
>>
>> YOU *selective* snipped and did NOT answer my questions
>>
>> Please do so!
>>
>> I suggest, YOU get real, Rich.
>>
>>
>>> The Redding Medical Center case cited in the article is an example of
>>> medical fraud, not medical errors. Rest assured if the doctor in
>>> question were committing repeated medical ERRORS he would have been
>>> dropped like a hot potato. Errors cost hospitals money. What he was
>>> doing was wrong, but it was fraud, not error. The fraud WAS discovered
>>> and corrected, by the way.
>>
>> Not error?!?!?!
>
> No, NOT error. The doctor knew exactly what he was doing, unnecessary
> surgery. It's wrong, but he wasn't making mistakes.

In *gang* land, *deliberate* error is not mistakes.
>
>
>>
>> Are we on the same page?!?!
>>
>> intentionally making false diagnoses of heart-related problems in order
>> to justify performing hundreds, if not thousands, of unnecessary
>> procedures and
>>>> surgeries.
>>
>> You don't consider that to be errors??? As in *deliberate* errors?
>
> Deliberate fraud. That is not what the new legislation is intended to
> address.

I didn't ask you what new legislation intended to address.

Now, Please answer the question.

You don't consider that to be errors??? As in *deliberate* errors?

>
>>
>> *Thousands* of people had unnecessary procedures and surgeries
>>
>> WOW!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> While other staff members were suspicious of the goings on at the
>>>> hospital, their concerns were dismissed by their superiors until the
>>>> scheme was exposed by one patient, a 55-year-old reverend, who sought a
>>>> second opinion after he was told he needed emergency triple bypass
>>>> surgery.
>>
>> TRIPLE BYPASS SURGERY!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>>Errors cost hospitals money
>>
>> A highly qualified cardiologist was shocked by the diagnosis and told the
>>>> patient that his heart was in perfect shape. Federal agents raided the
>>>> hospital and Tenet was eventually forced to pay $54 million in
>>>> penalties for the unnecessary heart procedures
>>
>> HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>
> They had to pay $54 million. That didn't cost money? And that was for
> fraud, not procedural or medication errors.

You stated:

Rest assured if the doctor in question
>>> were committing repeated medical ERRORS he would have been dropped like
>>> a hot potato. Errors cost hospitals money

They didn't drop him at ALL, he was MAKING MONEY!!!!!

You also stated:

The fraud WAS discovered and corrected, by the
>>> way.

You LIED, Rich!!!!!!!

FACT is, he was protected for two decades,

Then he got C A U G H T!!!!!!!



>
>
>>
>> *The fraud WAS discovered and corrected, by the way*
>>
>> This, however, does not change the fact that this single doctor was a
>>>> staple at the Redding Medical Center for almost
>>
>> ****two decades****
>>
>> and was being
>>>> protected by his superiors who were only concerned with the enormous
>>>> annual revenue he produced and not the quality or legitimacy of his
>>>> practice.
>
> Yes, that is scandalous, but it has nothing to do with a program to reduce
> medical errors.

*******This routine lack of accountability for medical errors is the main
reason
why they remain so prevalent and continue to be a threat throughout this
country and the world. *********

>
>
>>
>> While more that eager to hang this doctor who did the chelation and
>> saying he was *peeing his pants* you have tried to dismiss these *EVILS*
>> and turn it into a *Jan* thing.
>
> I don't dismiss them at all. I'm glad they got caught. Thieves are
> thieves. Medical errors are something else entirely.

*Deliberate* medical errors to make money are NOT something else entirely
>
> A doctor who does chelation on autistic children for profit is as guilty
> of thievery as one to does unnecessary CABG's.

Oh well, he's in PA, same state as Dr Wilson, who murdered without question
and remains on staff, and the *gang* can see no FRAUD, NO COVER UPS, NO
WRONG DOING.

How bout dem cookies, huh, Rich??

>
>
>
>>
>> I am calling your hand, Rich!!!!!!!!!
>
> Four aces. What you got? Maybe a better solution to the medical error
> problem?

Royal Flush. Better solution, more discipline, better reporting, <GASP> T R
U T H F U L L N E S S !!!!!!!
>
>
> --Rich
STARTING HERE


.

Quantcast