Re: License To Kill Is A OK Within Conventional Medicine


"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:trLQe.289650$x96.61355@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:BUzQe.7073$UE2.1309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:6JzQe.314885$xm3.70465@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> "Rich" <joshew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:V1zQe.7062$UE2.4133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>>
>>>> What would you propose as a better solution, Jan? Perhaps if we have
>>>> all the doctors taken out back and shot?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --Rich
>>>
>>> I suggest, YOU get real, Rich!!!!!!
>>
>>
>> In other words, you have no idea whatsoever how to make things better.
>> You just want to stamp your little feet about the way things are.
>
> YOU *selective* snipped and did NOT answer my questions
>
> Please do so!
>
> I suggest, YOU get real, Rich.
>
>
>> The Redding Medical Center case cited in the article is an example of
>> medical fraud, not medical errors. Rest assured if the doctor in question
>> were committing repeated medical ERRORS he would have been dropped like a
>> hot potato. Errors cost hospitals money. What he was doing was wrong, but
>> it was fraud, not error. The fraud WAS discovered and corrected, by the
>> way.
>
> Not error?!?!?!

No, NOT error. The doctor knew exactly what he was doing, unnecessary
surgery. It's wrong, but he wasn't making mistakes.


>
> Are we on the same page?!?!
>
> intentionally making false diagnoses of heart-related problems in order
> to
> justify
>>> performing hundreds, if not thousands, of unnecessary procedures and
>>> surgeries.
>
> You don't consider that to be errors??? As in *deliberate* errors?

Deliberate fraud. That is not what the new legislation is intended to
address.


>
> *Thousands* of people had unnecessary procedures and surgeries
>
> WOW!!!!!
>>>
>>> While other staff members were suspicious of the goings on at the
>>> hospital, their concerns were dismissed by their superiors until the
>>> scheme was exposed by one patient, a 55-year-old reverend, who sought a
>>> second opinion after he was told he needed emergency triple bypass
>>> surgery.
>
> TRIPLE BYPASS SURGERY!!!!!!!!!
>
>>Errors cost hospitals money
>
> A highly qualified cardiologist was shocked by the diagnosis and told the
>>> patient that his heart was in perfect shape. Federal agents raided the
>>> hospital and Tenet was eventually forced to pay $54 million in penalties
>>> for the unnecessary heart procedures
>
> HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

They had to pay $54 million. That didn't cost money? And that was for fraud,
not procedural or medication errors.


>
> *The fraud WAS discovered and corrected, by the way*
>
> This, however, does not change the fact that this single doctor was a
>>> staple at the Redding Medical Center for almost
>
> ****two decades****
>
> and was being
>>> protected by his superiors who were only concerned with the enormous
>>> annual revenue he produced and not the quality or legitimacy of his
>>> practice.

Yes, that is scandalous, but it has nothing to do with a program to reduce
medical errors.


>
> While more that eager to hang this doctor who did the chelation and saying
> he was *peeing his pants* you have tried to dismiss these *EVILS* and turn
> it into a *Jan* thing.

I don't dismiss them at all. I'm glad they got caught. Thieves are thieves.
Medical errors are something else entirely.

A doctor who does chelation on autistic children for profit is as guilty of
thievery as one to does unnecessary CABG's.



>
> I am calling your hand, Rich!!!!!!!!!

Four aces. What you got? Maybe a better solution to the medical error
problem?
--


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/


.

Quantcast