Re: Homeopathy is bunk! So what's new?
- From: "Happy Dog" <happydog@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 02:56:54 -0400
"Dan" <dgillila@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:
> Martin, what evidence do you have for calling him a crackpot.
Creates a theory woven from whole cloth.
Doesn't publish in peer reviewed journals.
Doesn't detail a method whereby his research can be replicated.
OK?
moo
.
- References:
- Homeopathy is bunk! So what's new?
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: Homeopathy is bunk! So what's new?
- From: Dan
- Re: Homeopathy is bunk! So what's new?
- From: Martin
- Re: Homeopathy is bunk! So what's new?
- From: Dan
- Homeopathy is bunk! So what's new?
- Prev by Date: The Fake <excatholic> speaks
- Next by Date: Re: Homeopathy is bunk! So what's new?
- Previous by thread: Re: Homeopathy is bunk! So what's new?
- Next by thread: Re: Homeopathy is bunk! So what's new?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|