Re: Opinions on Echinacea


PeterB wrote:
>
> Answer the question. Did you not swear off debating the data?

<snip>

Yep. Petey's plaintive begging got too much, though.

However, in his last reply:

Mentions of 'pharmablogging': 6 or 7

Oblique references to 'pharmablogging': Several more.

Evidence to support his contention that nutrition was the cause of the
precipitous drop in measles after the introduction of vaccination: NIL.
Not one piece.

Evidence to support his contention that measles vaccination works in
only 10% of cases: NIL.

There really is no point discussing anything with the poor boy.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Note for paul packer
    ... I present Exhibit 1 in support of my contention that he is an obstreperous ... jackass. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: 26 times more likely?
    ... >One of our regulars here has contended in the past that women should ... >very long time, despite having no evidence to support it, and it's ... None of you had any evidence whatsoever to support your contention ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: OT: Huckabee, Ughh
    ... "Religion" but that should not be construed to support any ... that they weren't "God fearing Christians". ... believers in public and private. ...
    (rec.woodworking)
  • Re: Found: Is this Platinum?
    ...  Sadly there is evidence to support your contention. ... making Nitric Acid ... ...
    (sci.chem)
  • Re: Recession music
    ... but you have not provided a single shred of real evidence to support ... your contention. ... Another thing is that in spite of the large number of people involved ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz)