Re: WARNING: Industry is Blogging These NewsGroups to Maintain Their Monopolies

PeterB wrote: 
Happy Dog wrote:

"PeterB" <pkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in

Idiot.  You have no evidence.  Produce some and take my money.  Can't
do
it can you?

For now, the evidence is you. Read the Warning and find yourself. 

That's it.  Really?  This is your evidence that there are paid shills
here.
My posts.  You are a looney.


I somehow missed your second response before today, but I'm glad I
revisited.  What's interesting is that you responded to a post I
retracted within 2 minutes of posting, and didn't post your retort for
almost TWO HOURS after that post vanished.  This means you had to copy
the retracted post in order to submit your reply, and you didn't do
this for almost TWO hours after I retracted.  Why on earth would you be
copying my posts?  I certainly don't copy yours.  Incredibly, you did
this within a 2 minute window of opportunity!


Since you're too stupid to understand how stupid the above is, I'll make it
simple.  There was no need to do anything but respond to your post in the
usual fashion.  You don't have any evidence that I did otherwise.  I guess
your post made it to my server before you retracted it.  Too bad, eh stupid?
Your narcissistic beliefs are, at once, paranoid and touching.



That's a blatant lie.  You could not have responded to my retracted
post TWO HOURS later without having copied it and written your response
offline.  You can't respond to a post that isn't there.  Good try,
genius, but I caught you with your pants down.  Again, only a Pharma
Blogger would do something like this.


I offer HappyMutt to the
reader as Prima Facia that only a Pharma Blogger would take the time,
or have a reason, to create documentation of this kind on a casual
poster (and one he calls a "loon.") Keep watching these patterns of
behaviour on the part of our resident Pharma Bloggers.


C'mon Peter.  Show some evidence.  Take my money.  Don't have any, do you?
Anonymous twit.



You really should pay up.  But I wouldn't expect a liar to have the
hundred bucks anyway.  My guess is you guys couldn't possibly make much
doing this crap for a living.

PeterB

Sooo, 'pharmabloggers' don't do what they do just because they like to do it, they do it because it's their job. However, you now claim that the pay sucks. So 'Big Pharma' is looking for folks motivated enough to be online all the time to attack people like you, folks that are smart enough to come up with replies that look like they know what they're talking about and who at the same time are so stupid that they don't realize that for all their hard work they don't even have a hundred bucks to spare. That's one hell of selection program 'Big Pharma' must have.
.

Relevant Pages