Re: cathy b the Repeated BLATANT LIAR
- From: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:46:34 GMT
"cathyb" <cathybeesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122276602.409663.147810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> LadyLollipop wrote:
>> "cathyb" <cathybeesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1122193658.259071.179130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >
>> > LadyLollipop wrote:
>> >> "cathyb" <cathybeesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:1122159871.584203.163850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > LadyLollipop wrote:
>> >> > <snip worthless rant>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Oh dear. Lollipop has forgotten that Petey has already said that he
>> >> > didn't mind when he noticed she'd "editorialised" his post
>> >>
>> >> If he said that he was confused, the fact is, I did NOT reply to HIS
>> >> post, I
>> >> replied to YOURS.
>> >>
>> >> I editorialised" nothing!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> . Now she's
>> >> > splicing I don't know how many posts to try and prove she didn't lie
>> >> > and someone else did. Good stuff--keep it up Jan:)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers,
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Cathy
>> >> >
>> >> The FACT is:
>> >>
>> >> Cathy can NOT keep her lies straight.
>> >>
>> >> Cathy is a BLATANT LIAR.
>> >>
>> >> Loopy hasn't noticed (?) that this next was part of my reply, not part
>> >> > > of Petey's post. Oh dear. See below.
>> >> >
>> >> > Cathy can't keep her lies straight. Oh dear.
>> >> >
>> >> > *As Lollipop must be aware from her creative snipping, she has
>> >> > joined
>> >> > >> together the two separate pieces from Petey's post where he said
>> >> > >> two
>> >> > >> different things*
>> >>
>> >> Pathetic.
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >
>> > Ah. All is explained. It appears Lollipop thinks if she spliced what
>> > Peter wrote as quoted in my post to change the meaning, that's just
>> > fine (even though she prefaced it with "Peter's words were:",
>> > indicating that she took them from Petey's post), and not lying at all.
>> > And then to repeat the procedure on another of my posts makes it even
>> > better than fine presumably.
>> >
>> > Oh, she's a marvel.
>> >
>> > Cathy
>>
>> Just *where* did you see "Peter's words were:"
>>
>> You didn't, you just made it up.
>>
>> If he said that he was confused.
<snip>
>> Your lies get bigger and bigger.
>>
>> Jan
<snip>
Just *where* did you see "Peter's words were:"
You didn't, you just made it up.
<snip
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cathy b the Repeated BLATANT LIAR
- From: cathyb
- Re: cathy b the Repeated BLATANT LIAR
- References:
- Re: cathy b the Repeated BLATANT LIAR
- From: cathyb
- Re: cathy b the Repeated BLATANT LIAR
- Prev by Date: Re: cathy b the Repeated BLATANT LIAR
- Next by Date: Re: cathy b the Repeated BLATANT LIAR
- Previous by thread: Re: cathy b the Repeated BLATANT LIAR
- Next by thread: Re: cathy b the Repeated BLATANT LIAR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|