Another Very Small Example of Richard H Jacobson's Hypocrisy & Obsession

In article <41bb2be7.2044...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

<Rich.@.> wrote:
>>I have set up an email address specifically to deal with abusive
>>posters on usenet. For those who are interested in stopping the
>>abusive posters I encourage you to send an email to jd_...@xxxxxxxxxx

>>Note that there is an underscore between jd and ykw in the above email
>>address.

>>When you send email please identify yourself as a regular poster on
>>mha.

Subject: Re: ATTENTION: How To Deal With Abusive Posters (And one in
>particular)
>From: wri...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David Wright)
>Date: 12/11/2004 10:51 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <UkHud.7549$nE7.7...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Um, how is this going to work? Or is that a secret?

From: jdrew63...@xxxxxxx (Jan) - Fi
Date: 12 Dec 2004 02:24:17 GMT
Local: Sat,Dec 11 2004 9:24 pm


LOL.

(From Rich's buddy cess pool mouth Andrew Kingoff)

John,

>I hope that you develop many serious disabilities.

>I hope that Jan Drew installs 2 dozen amalgams in your molars.

>I hope that you bathe with a plugged-in hair dryer.

>I hope that OJ Simpson suspects you of being "the real killer" of Nicole
>Brown
>&Ron Goldman.

>I hope that Karma continues to run over your dogma.

>Why, because you are a VILE, SPAMMING, PIECE OF ***.


From: Ilsa Nein (ils...@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: Deconstructing Atlas, Part I
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2001-09-12 11:45:04 PST

From: Ilsa Nein (ils...@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: Un- Deconstructing Atlas and the Rest
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2001-09-21 18:45:53 PST

From: Ilsa Nein (ils...@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: Zapper Hucksters Get Zapped
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2001-12-31 16:22:51 PST

>People who make, sell, or use Hulda's products or follow her advice should
>go
straight to hell and burn for seven eternities.

From: Ilsa Nein (ils...@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: In My Humble Opinion Only
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2002-01-17 09:11:22 PST

>That is such a self-serving piece of spam that I hope it sticks in your
>throat,
forcing Todd Gastaldo to perform an emergency epesiotomy on you.

>Leave MHA. Stop spamming. Rot in Hell.


From: Ilsa Nein (ils...@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: In My Humble Opinion Only
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2002-01-18 12:06:51 PST

>F*** you and the horse you rode off on....
>>>Uh, dumbass,
>Deconstructing Atlas
>Ass clown.

Cher,
>I apologize for not calling you an ignorant ***-face as often as you
>deserve it.


Anth, you are a fucking ***

Sreaming bag of feces

Douche bag

Playing with yourself

swallow anthing good lately?

=========

>From Rich, himself:

Could you imagine her relationship in real life. Lord have mercy on
her husband. And lord have mercy on every child that had to endure
this deranged woman in her day care center.

Jan Drew is a psychopathic liar.

Poor Jan. Such an angry woman. All she can do is spew her venom on
usenet.


Rich wrote:

(after Miss busy body on SMD did a search on Jan Drew's and Rich very well
knew it was NOT me, if fact, I if was a lady at a church offering to baby
sit. I had to call the church to let them know what was going on, Rich did
NOT care, this shows how evil he truly is)

I note that Jan may be currently involved with the
care of children. Considering her obvious psychotic, paranoid and
delusional thinking I am quite concerned about the welfare of these
children. It seems that every day we read about another child
victimized by evil people. I would hate to see another child be harmed
by another sicko.

Perhaps this is an exception to the rule that one should keep postings
on usenet confined to usenet. Perhaps someone should contact the
Church in Sarasota at least to warn them of the possibility that they
have a psychotic person involved with child care. Could you imagine if
one of the children was harmed by Jan and one of us could have done
something to stop it?? I don't believe that someone like Jan should be
trusted with the care of young children. Her behavior and demeanor in
these newsgroups offers evidence enough of her instability.

I realize that by saying the above that Jan is going to become very
angry and lash out at me personally. She is likely going to start a
new thread with my name in it just to harass me. But I feel it
important to protect the defenseless children with whom she may be caring
for.
===

Sadly Karuna appears to have lost her mind.

From: jbai...@xxxxxxx (John Bain)>Date: 7/6/01 7:12 AM US Eastern
StandardTime>Message-id: <20010706081244.03870.00000...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>

Rich<k...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:>

..>jdrew63929 writes

>>Ah, but I have followed it closely enough to ask the key question....on
what does Rich base his apparent belief that her improvement is only due to
her
relief of getting her teeth removed?

>>Within days of having her amalgams removed Jan reported that she felt
>>better
than she had in two years. At thetime that she felt better than she had in
two
years it is very likely that her mercury level was higher than it was before
she had the amalgams removed since the process of removing the amalgams
causes
a large release of mercury vapor that will be absorbed into the system. At
the
very least the mercury level inher body within days of having the amalgams
removed will be roughly the same as it was before she had them removed.
Since
the mercury level was either higher or the same, her improvement could not
possibly be due to the mercury level decreasing.

Jan, by her very own admission, stated that she believes that her
improvement
was due to her relief that she finally had the amalgams removed from her
mouth.

>>Yup, just as we thought, nothing but assumptions and
misinterpretations.Garbage in, garbage out. Rich only wants to stalk, as he
has
continually done to others in the past. He is stuck on the phrase, I feel
better than I have in two years.

> Evidently Rich has never searched for two years for an answer. *HE* was
> NOT
the one who did it! While this seems to be a big deal to Rich, he also has
NO
idea of how Ifelt during those two years.Therefore he can't and doesn't know
how I felt. He also can't relate to feeling of great relief that the dental
work was over .Rich's sole purpose here is to analyze anyone who disagrees
with
him. He overlooks all studies and evident that many people do get mercury
poisoning from mercury amalgams. Who does this sound like? He also is
obsessed
with who is telling lies, but said NOT one word when Andrew lied over and
over.Rich is a fake. I truly pity him. Something somewhere in either his
childhood or personal experience has made him bitter and he can''t control
his
obsessions. So rather than look for help with his own behaiors, he chooses
to
belittle others.You can easily see what Rich's weakness are. They are
EXACTLY
what he accuses others of.

>>On the one hand we have Jan's experience, and on the other hand we have

>>Rich's belief....a belief with is apparently based only on a few snippets
>>of
nformation from Jan. And it is Jan's experience, Jan's report of her state
of
health AND Jan's own belief that I am using to draw my conclusions.You see
it
is Jan HERSELF who believes that she felt better than she had intwo years
because of RELIEF that the amalgams were out of her mouth. Itis NOT just my
belief. But it is not the whole story.

>But Rich does't care

Bingo!

Jan,

>it gives him his reasons to stalk Jan just as
>he has stalked others here. "Proof" is apparently in the eye of the
beholder....since different people have different standards of proof. Of
course. Jan's standard of proof is simply what she believes to be true
regardless of what the evidence may demonstrate.

>>Self referential from the King of self-referential statements.


Best wishes>

--John Bains


.

Loading