Re: Testosterone is anabolic or not?


Pete wrote:
"JMW" <jmwilliams_56@xxxxxxxxx> schreef:

Dont become cocky just because there is an article on Meso written by you.

Actually, there a few of my articles there, but that's not relevant.
The relevant point is that those articles have existed for years, so
this is not just something I Googled in response to your post. I have
studied the literature on these issues in much greater depth than most
imagine, largely because I had put a lot of work into a book on *legal*
ergogenic aids being used in a timed cycle consistent with circadian
rhythms. The prospects for that book went down the drain when the US
government banned prohormones, but nearly all of the research was
finished, and I was about half finished with an initial draft,
including all the graphs and charts.

The bottom line is that I know a lot more about this stuff than most
people imagine. My personal experience is using those aids is limited
to the formerly legal prohormones, but even they can have
well-recognized side effects (like 1-AD). And the ugly truth is that
users of *any* drug are not the most objective people when it comes to
discussing the downside. That is a subject that I can comment on from
all sides.

My response was a response to the fact that YOU pointed out that the whole
strory, whatever that means, should be told. I was under the assumption that
you meant that everytime a guy comes along asks a *simple* question about a
first steroid cycle then i will respond by saying **WHATEVER THE *** IT IS
I WANT TO SAY !!!**

Dont start to play moderator on ME John, that wont work.

Is this clear?

I got an idea;

I will ignore them from now on, and let YOU answer. After all, i only tell
part, the *good* part of course, while you, tell the entire story. Deal?

Pete, if I didn't think you had something to offer, I would probably
killfile you. After all, at least half your posts are responses to
people that I already have killfiled. If I wasn't interested in what
you had to say on these subjects, I might not read your posts at all.
Which leads to ...

You might also want to advise your little buddy, the art teacher, that
I know a hell of a lot more about this stuff than he thinks I do.

What has Curt has to do with you and me discussing anabolic steroids?

Check your newreader, Pete. The art teacher responded to the same
post, apparently believing that he needed to defend you. He does that
stuff a lot.

Thats between you and him. Leave me out of it.

Why? You encourage him. But for your responses, almost nobody but an
occasional newbie will reply to him, and that's only because he sucks
up to every newbie that posts here. He doesn't know diddly about
weight training or nutrition; he goes to the gym to trot on the
treadmill.

Oh, yes, he loves to chat you up about femuscle. Fine. Why aren't the
two of posting in alt.amazon-women.admirers? It's a fairly
high-traffic newsgroup, and that's the subject matter for which it is
specifically designed.

The only reason that the art teacher stays here is to troll. If you
encourage him, don't expect that to go without comment.

.

Quantcast