Re: Ping JMW
- From: "Larry Hodges" <2larry2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:25:16 -0800
"Richard" <vidasduday@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fMidnbezSpBxyLHZnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Larry Hodges wrote:
Ok, I used your site to calculate my BF today. (I had a trainer at the
gym take the measurements with the gym's metal calipers.) But...I have
discrepancies.
Also, I only took each measurement once, and use that number for the
three values. Don't know if that's a big deal. We were pressed for
time.
With the 7 point method, I got 14.88%. Using the same numbers with the 3
point calculation, I got 11.93%. I'm assuming the 7 point is the more
accurate and I really am a fat ***? Do you normally have that much
of a difference.
Also, the trainer thought for sure that the 7 point took a pinch on the
calf. As she remembered it anyway. Are there different methods? If so,
why did you choose this one?
-Larry
Larry I use Jackson-Pollock 3 and 7 site, the Pollock 3 site and something
called "P-9" and it is only the latter that takes the calf.
Richard
Thanks for the input Richard.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ping JMW
- From: McPervert
- Re: Ping JMW
- References:
- Ping JMW
- From: Larry Hodges
- Re: Ping JMW
- From: Richard
- Ping JMW
- Prev by Date: Re: UltraSonic Skin Scrubber on Ebay
- Next by Date: Re: Ping JMW
- Previous by thread: Re: Ping JMW
- Next by thread: Re: Ping JMW
- Index(es):