Re: Is this considered spam?

John Hanson <jhanson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:35:59 GMT, "David Cohen"
<sammiesdad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:


"John Hanson" <jhanson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/

Kewl. I want one.

I'm still trying to figure out what technology it uses to cycle the
action (gas or recoil). Also, I wonder if it's adjustable. I've seen
many a Black Eagle fail to fire on light target loads and have fired
heavy waterfowl loads that kicked like a mule. The point being it may
be a horse*** shotgun for waterfowl. But, who wants to use a $1000+
shotgun for waterfowl because it WILL rust to some degree.

I have a Baikal that has a patent pending adjustable action that uses
recoil to cycle the action. It actually works pretty good and I'd
like to see more manufacturers use that technology. Who'd a thunk the
Ruskies would have come up with that one.

My guess is that it's an adjustable gas-op. Probably a light alloy
barrel, too. Open the gas port wide, toss in some low-brass shells,
and add an impressive trick shooter.
.

Loading