Re: Update - JMW vs David (Oz)
- From: JRH <jonny@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:00:24 +0000
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:36:11 +0800, spodosaurus
<spodosaurus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>David wrote:
>> JMW has
>> continuously misused his position as a public officer with actions
>> unbecoming to an officer of the law.
>
>Now, I'm no lawyer, so I have to ask: is what David wrote above slander
>or libel? I always get those two confused.
If that which David wrote is untrue then it could be potentially
libellous.
Slander is uttering untruths via the spoken word.
Whatever has been said about John Williams, would have to be weighed
against that which he has committed to the written word about scores
of other people using this and other newsgroups. As he sows so must he
reap!
HTH!
Have a great weekend Ari and a happy and successful New Year - I
intend to! ;o)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update - JMW vs David (Oz)
- From: Bagpip
- Re: Update - JMW vs David (Oz)
- From: spodosaurus
- Re: Update - JMW vs David (Oz)
- References:
- Update - JMW vs David (Oz)
- From: David
- Update - JMW vs David (Oz)
- Prev by Date: Re: Deadlift/Olympic lifts question
- Next by Date: Re: More stupid politician tricks
- Previous by thread: Update - JMW vs David (Oz)
- Next by thread: Re: Update - JMW vs David (Oz)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|