Re: Sun uv a gun
- From: JRH <chuck@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:39:29 +0000
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:39:19 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>"Curt James" <cwj111@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>J M Would-you-look-at-the-poop-on-that-dog's-fur? <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Curt James <cwj111@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>JMW <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>Group consensus on whether trolls remain will be
>>>>You're a worse troll than Davidson ever was.
>>>>Amazingly, it would seem that you actually believe your
>>>>hype or blather. Davidson's input, on the other hand,
>>>>was obvious schtick and satire designed to get a rise.
>>>>And what group consensus?
>>>Allow me to explain, Curt ...
>> I suspected you couldn't hold your tongue. The so-called troll enabler
>> /enabler/ speaks!
>>>You and your compatriots appear to think it's all the
>>>of me and maybe a few other MFW regulars.
>> Who would those MFW regulars be? Who is in your so-called corner?
>> Dally? Hanson? Hodges? Om? David?
>> Dally posts all around. Om is even-handed and diplomatic. David is
>> considerate across the board for the most part. Even Hanson has
>> replied in a sensible non-confrontational manner recently. Hodges just
>> got back from his self-imposed exile, so I wouldn't be so quick to
>> count him as /your/ so-called compatriot simply because I don't think
>> any of those people are as stupifyingly arrogant as you seem to be.
>> And what fault are you placing? What fault? What trolls?
>> Overall, what exactly is your *problem*?
>> This is all post and reply. Again, what /fault/?
>>>If that's the case, then consider these questions:
>>>If it's all our fault, why can't anyone in rec.arts.bodyart
>>>stand you, either?
>> I wasn't aware that NO ONE here could stand me. Because, hey, either
>> would indicate that both MFW and RAB /can't stand me/.
>> And re RAB, been over there recently? Just had a pleasant reply from a
>> patron interested in a tattoo cover-up. Your statement is incorrect.
>> However, yes, I typically have difficulties with pompous
>> I-am-the-center-of-the-universe types. It's your lucky day.
>>>If it's all our fault, why was Hudson one of the reasons that
>>>alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated was created?
>> So, you're telling me that there had been (or is) an
>> alt.support.anxiety-panic around but Charles drove them to such a
>> state of anxious panic that they created a moderated version?
>> I suspect that patrons of anxiety-panic wouldn't need much prodding.
>> Kinda like _alt.just.one.more.ounce.of.pressure_ getting that one
>> added ounce. Regardless, I'm not interested in your war with Hudson,
>> Williams. He can take care of himself. Can you?
>>>If it's all our fault, why are people already killfiling Hudson in
>> Because you suck? Just a guess.
>> Seriously (well, that WAS serious), take all this to Charles'
>> doorstep, not mine because 1) I don't necessarily believe a word you
>> say and 2) I'm not Charles. But, hey, this is an UNmoderated
>> newsgroup, so blather away. Unlike you, I don't need a killfile - oh,
>> wait, you apparently don't need one either - to decide who to reply to
>> and who to ignore.
>>>A bit of advice for you, Curt:
>>>If everywhere you go smells like dog shit, check the soles
>>>of your shoes.
>> You are so profound.
>> How about this one? If the soles of my shoes are covered in dog shit
>> then perhaps I should stop kicking shitty-assed dogs in the rear. Not
>> that I'd do that, but it certainly offers a more accurate image.
>Funny this thing about digging around other newsgroups and using it as a
>'weapon' against those you wish to get a leg up. Suppose someone from
>another group looks around MFW. How easy would it be to go back and say
>about the following people - JMW, JRH, Curt, David, Dally and a number of
>others - "no one in MFW can stand you" -
Too near the truth David.
- Prev by Date: Re: Anabolic/Angrogenic States
- Next by Date: Re: Sun uv a gun
- Previous by thread: Re: Sun uv a gun
- Next by thread: Re: Sun uv a gun