Re: Bill will never win
- From: Alan Mallick <Conundrum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:24:43 -0500
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:14:54 +0000 (UTC), Donovan Rebbechi
<abuse@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>I wrote the word "seconded" in response to Bill's vote. How would you
>interpret that ? I don't think there's much ambiguity -- use of the word
>"seconded" usually suggests agreement with the preceding text, right ? I'm
>sorry if you or anyone else found it confusing, but I hope at this stage
>that my original intent is clear.
Donovan,
These are muscleheads, you must write it out in short, preferably
one-syllable words, and keep it simple, and they'll STILL screw it up.
.
- References:
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: David
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: JRH
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: David
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: Dave Hillstrom
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: OmManiPadmeOmelet
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: Dave Hillstrom
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: David
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: Nomad
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: Curt James
- Re: Bill will never win
- From: Donovan Rebbechi
- Re: Bill will never win
- Prev by Date: Re: Bill will never win
- Next by Date: Re: Energy Drinks - What's the hype about?
- Previous by thread: Re: Bill will never win
- Next by thread: Re: Bill will never win
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|