Re: Calculating a 1RM???


"Proctologically Violated©®" <physical@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0PydnZ2dnZ2rAnb7nZ2dnccMiN6dnZ2dRVn-yp2dnZ0@xxxxxxxxxx
> It only sounds like wind to you cuz you don't understand the words.
>
> But, it is nice to be stalked by a fan... I still feel safe, tho, cuz
> this particular fan is dickless.
> ----------------------------
> Mr. P.V.'d
> formerly Droll Troll

/ ~ \
|\__/
| |
| . |
| `.` |
__| `` | `.` |/~~\
/ | | | `` |/~~\
| | | | | `` | /
\ ` . . | |
\ . . ` /
\ . . /
\ . /
| . |
| |
| |
| |
/------------\












> "Bob Garrison" <bobnsg63@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:37OdndDfy9P2FYjeRVn-sg@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Proctologically Violated©®" <physical@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:vpKdnexqbvOo0YjeRVn-ow@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> These goddamm formulas are a dime a dozen--HR, BMR, 1RM, goodgawd....
>>> The funny thing about them is that they make no sense whatsoever--they
>>> are basically empirical curve fitting using half-assed "power series" in
>>> math, and are not based on any physical, chemical, or physiological law.
>>> Thus "end users", not familiar with the underlying science or lack
>>> thereof, often give these formulas much more weight than they deserve.
>>> Ersatz formulae?
>>> The funnier thing is: They serve virtually no purpose whatsoever,
>>> except mebbe, say, for an institutional dietitian "calculating" portion
>>> sizes for some large population.
>>> Researchers grind these goddamm things out just to keep their names in
>>> print somewhere.
>>> ----------------------------
>>
>> Hey top posting windbag, shut the *** up!
>>
>
>


.

Quantcast