Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy


<Ellis> wrote in message news:em0ae1tb54ei5d4n66m1samchb69cv6i9u@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:04:23 -0500, John Hanson
> <jhanson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>No it isn't and it sounds like these cops were nothing but incompetent
>>idiots.
>
> What should they have done differently?
>
Paticularly when they think it is a suicide bomber. The tactics they used
were specifically designed to stop a suicide bomber. Any bullet to the body
can set off a very powerful explosive killing many people. The only way to
stop them is multiple headshots. Delivered fast enough that they can't push
a button on the detonator.

Situations was is that the retard acted like a suicide bomber and refused to
cooperate with the police. It was ultimate stupidity. It is like those
morons who don't wear much clothing while driving in hot weather and get
stopped by the police. A certain percentage of them dive under the seat to
get their license.

They end up looking down the barrel of a gum. Usually protesting that the
armed response was some how inappropriate. Simple rules for dealing with
cops. Smile. Be courteous. Don't fight or argue. And don't do anything that
looks like you are going to hurt anybody. Don't run. Etc., etc.

Simple stuff. It ain't a conspiracy. It is just common sense and courtesy.
Something a lot of folks have trouble understanding and/or doing.

Darwinism is alive and well.



.