Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- From: "Lee Michaels" <leemichaels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:18:56 -0400
"John Hanson" <jhanson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>
> It troubles me that I'm agreeing with Dally and Donovan.
I noticed that too. Wimping out on us John? :)
> Having said
> that, I'm confused about this "shoot to kill" policy. If you are
> going to shoot, aren't you always shooting to kill...or to stop. Same
> thing basically. My main problems with the shooting are:
>
> 1.) The cops may not have identified themselves properly.
>
Doubtful. I am sure they did.
> 2.) If the guy was such a threat, why did they allow him to get into
> the tube?
>
Maybe they wanted to follow him to see where he went.
> 3.) The account I read said they had him pinned to the ground when he
> was shot. That is just not right if it's true.
>
>
If he had a bomb, it would make sense. And he never got to prove otherwise.
Because like a dumbass, he was running.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- From: John Hanson
- Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- References:
- Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- From: W. Bacon
- Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- From: John Hanson
- Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- From: Lee Michaels
- Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- From: Lee Michaels
- Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- From: Dally
- Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- From: John Hanson
- Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- Prev by Date: Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- Next by Date: Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- Previous by thread: Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- Next by thread: Re: Brits new "shoot to kill" policy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|