Re: Eminent domain and N.O.
- From: Andy Hill <andy_hill@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:43:56 GMT
Bert Hyman <bert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>gary@xxxxxxxx (gary) wrote in news:_OSdnXeXf_Clz6TeRVn-qw@xxxxxxxx:
>
>> Based on the Supreme Court's decision as to land grabbing legally,
>> wouldn't it be within the definition of "the greater good" if the
>> state simply seized all the land below sealevel in N.O. and flooded
>> it.
>
>They can't just "seize" it, they have to pay for it.
>
>Easier would be for the various governments to simply stop paying for
>rebuilding, time after time.
>
I seem to remember that, after the Mississippi River flood of '93, the feds
would pay for rebuilding only if the new buildings were out of the flood plain.
Seems like a similar restriction would be in order for New Orleans.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Eminent domain and N.O.
- From: AllEmailDeletedImmediately
- Re: Eminent domain and N.O.
- References:
- Eminent domain and N.O.
- From: gary
- Re: Eminent domain and N.O.
- From: Bert Hyman
- Eminent domain and N.O.
- Prev by Date: Re: It's time to get rid of the 9/10 cent on gas pumps
- Next by Date: Re: Bank One "Check Image Fee"
- Previous by thread: Re: Eminent domain and N.O.
- Next by thread: Re: Eminent domain and N.O.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
