Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- From: Javier <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:07:49 -0400
$cott wrote:
Given that (a) 6.75 is a very good rate (with 7% being the
midpoint of what I call typical rates) and (b) 6.75 is a
market rate (as opposed to a high risk rate), I think backing
out was a pretty poor thing to do. If a 1/4 point make all
that much difference in your ability to purchase the place,
then I suggest that you are looking at something that is far
more costly than what you can afford.
-john-
John,
Actually 6.75% (I assume this rate is a no-points purchase loan) is not
a very good rate, it is a very high rate even for the today's market
(Yes, it is a very good rate historically speaking).
So what is a very good rate, in today's market?
-jav
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- From: Todd H.
- Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- References:
- Financing Contingency Issue
- From: KJNitz
- Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- From: Daniel . Gustafson
- Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- From: Todd H.
- Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- From: KJNitz
- Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- From: John A. Weeks III
- Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- From: KJNitz
- Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- From: John A. Weeks III
- Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- From: $cott
- Financing Contingency Issue
- Prev by Date: Re: real estate agent help
- Next by Date: Re: real estate agent help
- Previous by thread: Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- Next by thread: Re: Financing Contingency Issue
- Index(es):