Re: my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- From: Joe Kesselman <keshlam-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:12:56 -0400
David Carlisle wrote:
yes true, as far as it goes, of course it does leave me (as editor of the mathml dtd with its ~2000 entity definitions with no viable schema technology replacement) with something of a problem:-)
Yeah, I know. Entities are the one thing DTDs did that schemas decided not to. The current recommendations are either to use just enough of a DTD to provide those and to use schema for the rest (ugh), or to use some other macro facility or to define tags for the purpose (which doesn't address languages that started out in the DTD world). Sigh.
XML was rushed into use before it was stable. The *right* way to do it would have been to fully define the infoset, with types and namespaces, and then to derive the schema language and syntax and so on from that... but we didn't have that luxury; in order for XML to win acceptance as quickly as it did, it had to be rolled out in stages, syntax first. That's left us with a few warts. Someday there may be an XML 2.0 which goes back and cleans everything up -- probably about the time XML is ready to graduate from Recommendation to Standard -- but that isn't likely to happen very soon.
XML is still a good thing; it could be better but we're already using it productively and nobody really wants to delay that while we wait.
--
() ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Joe Kesselman
/\ Stamp out HTML e-mail! | System architexture and kinetic poetry
.
- References:
- my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- From: Ultrus
- Re: my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- From: Peter Flynn
- Re: my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- From: Ultrus
- Re: my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- From: Joe Kesselman
- Re: my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- From: David Carlisle
- Re: my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- From: Joe Kesselman
- Re: my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- From: David Carlisle
- my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- Prev by Date: Re: Arguments for and against storing data in attributes
- Next by Date: Re: Arguments for and against storing data in attributes
- Previous by thread: Re: my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- Next by thread: Re: my first xml schema - I think it's good. Is it really?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|