Re: XML and its uses
- From: Peter Flynn <peter.nosp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:37:48 +0100
Joe Kesselman wrote:
But human-readable documents are becoming the least interesting application of XML
Actually they are the most interesting and challenging.
The use of XML for data-exchange is largely a done deal, with vast
amounts of software available, plentiful skills, relatively simple data
models, and ample support (even if people do go off at a tangent
sometimes :-)
By contrast, modelling human-readable information is *hard*, with many unsolved problems, poorly-developed software, and only a few experts.
It isn't "just publishing": there's a large amount of work still to be done, and this makes it -- for me -- by far the most interesting area.
///Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XML and its uses
- From: Joe Kesselman
- Re: XML and its uses
- References:
- XML and its uses
- From: Zamdrist
- Re: XML and its uses
- From: Joseph Kesselman
- Re: XML and its uses
- From: Zamdrist
- Re: XML and its uses
- From: Peter Flynn
- Re: XML and its uses
- From: Joe Kesselman
- XML and its uses
- Prev by Date: Re: XML and its uses
- Next by Date: Re: XML and its uses
- Previous by thread: Re: XML and its uses
- Next by thread: Re: XML and its uses
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|