Re: Critique my thesis typesetting?
- From: Zeljko Vrba <zvrba.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:05:10 +0000 (UTC)
On 2008-10-26, dkjk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <dkjk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am far from being a guru, but here are a few comments:
Would any LaTeX gurus here be willing to comment on the typesetting of
my thesis and/or suggest possible improvements?
- as soon as I've opened the document, my first impression was "this looks
like Word production" (probably because of the Times font)
- is this 12 point font? with 11- or even 10-point you could have made
larger margins and still have the same amount of pages (narrower text is
easier to read, at least for me)
- having 1, 1.1 and nothing after (i.e. following at least 1.2) indicates "bad
structuring" according to some people I've talked with on the topic before
("Nomenclature" would be a fine place to move it to)
On a side-note: what did you use to draw commutative diagrams and "springs"?
Graphs look as if produced with Mathematica - am I correct? -- unequal upper
and lower bounds of side-by-side graphs is also symptomatic for Mathematica :)
[e.g. see figure 4]
Anyway, "beautiful" is very subjective, and I would probably like your text
much better with plain report package (maybe scrreprt) without any extra font
tweaks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Critique my thesis typesetting?
- From: dkjk
- Re: Critique my thesis typesetting?
- References:
- Critique my thesis typesetting?
- From: dkjk
- Critique my thesis typesetting?
- Prev by Date: Re: adjusting margins with a4wide option
- Next by Date: 'BoundingBox error' .eps problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Critique my thesis typesetting?
- Next by thread: Re: Critique my thesis typesetting?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|