Re: arrayjob incompatibility with amsmath?



Yes, you can't use arrayjob in documents that have arrays (in the
sense of \begin{array}..\end{array}).

One way to fix this is to take arrayjob.sty and replace the three
occurrences of \array with, e.g., \Array. Global search/replace of
\array by \Array should do the trick. Then, of course, you have to
use \Array instead of \array in your document.

-R

On Jan 21, 8:41 am, Hubert Lam <publish...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Morten Høgholm wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:10:18 +0100, Hubert Lam wrote:

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{pstricks,pstricks-add,arrayjob,amsmath}

arrayjobdefines an \array command but this is not very likely to work
with most LaTeX documents as the command \array is the one used whenever
you type \begin{array}. The cases environment does so.

Thanks Morten. That is great help indeed.

Does anyone know of an alternative package toarrayjob?

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system
    ... > many intrinsic functions only return 'default' integers ... > with large arrays. ... That's fixed in f2003 (and in at least some current compilers, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: ERROR: CAT arguments dimensions are not consistent
    ... CAT arguments dimensions are not consistent. ... you should make sure of the sizing of your arrays. ... so my problem lies with the log of sizes then? ... i am not sure how to fix it. ...
    (comp.soft-sys.matlab)
  • Re: g95 wish list
    ... >> g77 fails to recognize this when bounds check is enabled. ... >> to fix that. ... bounds checking on arrays that actually *DO* have bounds of 1. ... codes with this hack, I'd say that made a lot more sense than ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: find a number in a cell
    ... This formula removes one of the SUBSTITUTE function calls and arrays the "find me" text... ... Here is a patch to your formula to fix this problem... ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.misc)