Re: TeX pestilence
- From: David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:57:51 +0100
Michele Dondi <bik.mido@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:53:07 +0000, Timothy Murphy
<tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Making LaTeX to do the job it has been designed for is amazingly
hard.
I don't think anything in LaTeX is "amazingly hard".
You're seemingly refusing to understand that he's not talking about
*using* LaTeX, but *creating* LaTeX.
To be fair, this particular sentence was not phrased well at all by
me. While I am somewhat strained to believe this to be an honest
mistake in the context of the discussion, Timothy has consistently
never in this thread actually made a statement pertaining to TeX as a
_programming_ system, never mind that this was what he was responding
to from the get-go.
It would appear to me that he is somewhat of a creationist regarding
TeX/LaTeX: his discussion approach more or less assumes them as
God-given, and he seems to consider their apparent evolution past
their creation an uncalled-for insignificant detail, or at least
nothing where human intervention should be considered relevant. While
his thought patterns and discussion approach appear completely alien
and ridiculous to me, I can't rule out that he finds them perfectly
consistent and reasonable.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
UKTUG FAQ: <URL:http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TeX pestilence
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: TeX pestilence
- References:
- Re: TeX pestilence
- From: David Kastrup
- Re: TeX pestilence
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: TeX pestilence
- Prev by Date: Re: hyperref and pst-pdf not showing pdf-properties set by hypersetup
- Next by Date: hyperref links on pageref
- Previous by thread: Re: TeX pestilence
- Next by thread: Re: TeX pestilence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading