Re: Scientific Workplace vs Latex2e
In article <85veq6ni2e.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
[ snip ]
I am still curious to know about what kind of problems make learning
Emacs so much harder than learning an arbitrary other editor one has
not used before.
There must be something about this sentence of yours that I don't
understand, because the answer seems so obvious to anyone with any
exposure to the way most people use computers these days (not me,
or at least most of the time, probably not you, but most people) ....
Do you mean emacs or xemacs? if the former, hm, I would think that
most people these days find the user interface off-putting -- if it
doesn't present you with a bunch of menus and give the impression
that you can just start doing stuff without any need to read any
documentation, they're not interested.
Or maybe the way to make the point I'm trying to make is that many
people these days don't particularly want to *learn* any editor;
they want to start using it right away, and may never be interested
in developing any expertise that would require more effort than
navigating menus, etc. I don't think you can get far with emacs
with this approach.
B. L. Massingill
ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.
- Prev by Date: Re: TeX/LaTeX improvement suggestion
- Next by Date: Re: TeX/LaTeX improvement suggestion
- Previous by thread: Re: Scientific Workplace vs Latex2e
- Next by thread: Re: Scientific Workplace vs Latex2e