Re: Package 'Fancythm': tester & texperts wanted
- From: Luc Mercier <google.me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 13:35:34 -0500
tsy wrote:
ntheorem gives the same functionality plus many additional features. Is
there any reason for adding one more package for theorems?
Ho, I didn't know about ntheorem. I'm going to have a look at that right away.
It would be
great to have enhanced framed package instead which deals correctly
with footnotes. One can produce fanciest theorems with LaTeX, but
footnotes in them are close to impossible.
For this problem, a trick is to separate to \footnotemark, that you place in the theorem, and the corresponding \footnotetext, that you place right after. That works fine.
But that's a good idea: I'm going to see if I can include a \renewcommand on \footnote inside theorems not to have to use this trick.
Funny, latex dvi and pdflatex pdf are different for the example. See
the snapshot
http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/1272/snap2au.png
Hummm.... interresting. I will work on that too.
Thanks for the comments !
Luc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Package 'Fancythm': tester & texperts wanted
- From: Luc Mercier
- Re: Package 'Fancythm': tester & texperts wanted
- References:
- Package 'Fancythm': tester & texperts wanted
- From: Luc Mercier
- Re: Package 'Fancythm': tester & texperts wanted
- From: tsy
- Package 'Fancythm': tester & texperts wanted
- Prev by Date: Re: Setting poetry.
- Next by Date: Selectively suppress page numbers in contents page
- Previous by thread: Re: Package 'Fancythm': tester & texperts wanted
- Next by thread: Re: Package 'Fancythm': tester & texperts wanted
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|