Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- From: Piet van Oostrum <piet@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:35:30 +0200
>>>>> Jon Haugsand <jonhaug@xxxxxxxxxx> (JH) wrote:
>JH> There exists standards that are published, but that you cannot make
>JH> your own implementation without paying. Are these "open"?
The European Interoperability Framework (EIF) uses the following requirements:
- Be adopted and maintained by a not-for-profit organisation, and its
ongoing development must occur on the basis of an open decision-making
procedure available to all interested parties.
- Be published and available either freely or at a nominal charge. It must
be permissible to all to copy, distribute and use it for no fee or at a
nominal fee.
- Make related intellectual property irrevocably available on a
royalty-free basis.
- Have no constraints on standard re-use.
The BSA protests against the third requirement (royalty-free).
--
Piet van Oostrum <piet@xxxxxxxx>
URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet [PGP 8DAE142BE17999C4]
Private email: piet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- From: jlrn77
- Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- References:
- is (La)TeX and open format?
- From: jlrn77
- Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- From: Skarmander
- Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- From: Jon Haugsand
- Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- From: jlrn77
- Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- From: Jon Haugsand
- is (La)TeX and open format?
- Prev by Date: Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- Next by Date: Re: prob combining \framebox & \hrule
- Previous by thread: Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- Next by thread: Re: is (La)TeX and open format?
- Index(es):