Re: OTish: Which version of Linux for PC?
- From: Marc Cooper <spamfree@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 00:21:10 +0100
Brooks Moses said...
> Marc Cooper wrote:
> > I have a 'spare' PC (PIII 800) and I am contemplating trying Linux for
> > the first time. (This is not completely OT, since other than
> > exploration/education, I plan to use it for TeX.)
>
> One of the main recommendations, I think, is to get a current teTeX
> package and install that, rather than using the one that comes with
> whatever Linux distribution you use -- for some reason, those seem to
> often be out-of-date, or be missing important pieces.
Thanks for the advice. Although I use MikTex I have a TeX Live CD here
(2003 demo with Feb 2004 updates) that came with the LaTeX Companion; I
believe that this is teTeX on Unix. Hopefully, that'll work out -
assuming that I can get the CD/DVD drive working with Linux!
> > Which version - distribution, I think you call it - would folk
> > recommend?
>
> It's been a while since I've installed a copy of Linux, but these days
> what I would go with in Debian. My sysadmin friends all consider it to
> be the best, though the install process can be a little bit long and
> complicated -- but, on the other hand, it does give you a good sense of
> what all is being installed, and lots of control over that when you want
> it.
That's fine, probably ideal. Time to crack a fresh notebook, me thinks.
> Debian also has a good automatic update system; I consider it
> fairly telling that my sysadmin friends actually _use_ it (while I don't
> think they'd even consider using automatic updates on Windows).
Interesting. It's certainly going to be a whole new world.
> Debian comes in three versions: "stable", "unstable", and "testing".
> Their "unstable" is roughly equivalent to anyone else's "stable"
> version, and their "stable" version is "We don't change anything except
> security fixes after release, so you never have to deal with commands
> changing their syntax or functionality when you do an update." Even the
> "testing" is reliable enough that I know people who run their desktops
> on it, though they are people who like playing with new software toys.
As I typed, I ordered a copy, so I'll soon find out. Staggering that it
needs two DVDs (14 CDs seemed like way too much work - memories of the
old days). It was incredibly cheap too (even better if they provide a
VAT invoice).
--
Best,
Marc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OTish: Which version of Linux for PC?
- From: Scott Thatcher
- Re: OTish: Which version of Linux for PC?
- From: Harry Schmidt
- Re: OTish: Which version of Linux for PC?
- References:
- OTish: Which version of Linux for PC?
- From: Marc Cooper
- Re: OTish: Which version of Linux for PC?
- From: Brooks Moses
- OTish: Which version of Linux for PC?
- Prev by Date: Re: I am a LAMER
- Next by Date: Re: shortstack formatting query
- Previous by thread: Re: OTish: Which version of Linux for PC?
- Next by thread: Re: OTish: Which version of Linux for PC?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|