Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- From: Warren M <warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 08:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 1, 2:07 pm, Keith Dick <kd...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
What you say surprises me a little. My experience with Pathway was that everyone used PROGRAMs to test their Screen Cobol programs. But the situations I saw were all with users whose applicatons used only 6530 terminals, where nothing extra had to be done beyond setting up the PROGRAM. Maybe the use of PROGRAMs is much less among programmers who develop Screen COBOL for 3270 terminals.
Keith, there are a several reasons for that.
1) In a development environment, most developers have multiple 6530
TACL windows open and it's very easy to do a RUN PROGRAM in one window
while debugging the Screen Cobol requester or the server in another
window.
2) If an organization has a need for Screen Cobol program to run on
both 6530 and 3270 terminals, it is usually done by using a compile
toggle around the respective OBJECT-COMPUTER clauses. The rest of the
program is usually identical. Since the code is identical, most
testing is done via 6530 sessions since those are more commonly
available.
3) In a production environment, users generally don't have access to
TACL, so RUN PROGRAM is seldom used in a production environment
regardless of whether it is a 3270 or 6530.
4) One major difference between the 3270 and a 6530 is that the 3270
is a block mode only device. Unlike the 6530 it does not have a
native conversational mode. ETN3270 simulates conversational mode by
painting a block mode screen with an 80 character unprotected row.
When a function key is hit, that row is read back and returned to the
conversational program that posted the writeread. ETN3270 maintains
an internal scroll buffer so the most recent 23 lines are displayed
each time the "conversational" screen is repainted. So it is somewhat
pedantic to start a TACL on a 3270 just to do a RUN PROGRAM to start a
block mode SCOBOL program, although it is indeed possible.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- From: Keith Dick
- Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- References:
- Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- From: Keith Dick
- Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- From: ChinmaY
- Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- From: Keith Dick
- Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- Prev by Date: Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- Next by Date: Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- Previous by thread: Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- Next by thread: Re: PROGRAMS in Pathway
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|